<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Energy Compliance in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28293#M2427</link>
    <description>Ontario, Canada has had ASHRAE 90.1 requirements incorporated in the Building Code since about 1995. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I took a course on compliance when I was a building inspector. Funny to that the course was designed for architects and engineers and there were only about oneof each in a class of about 30. BTW it was a freebee put on by then Ontario Hydro.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the course material and manual there was software that helped analyze  the building on the prescriptive / and or optional paths. I think I still may have a copy of both the lighting and envelope programs but they are probably out of date...considering that they ran under DOS....</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gpowless</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-17T02:23:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Compliance</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28292#M2426</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;It is here and Archicad has no clue about it, designing for energy compliance. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
To meet or beat the energy standard, which is a critical component of LEED and has also become the default energy code for most states the ASHRAE 90.1&lt;BR /&gt;
. &lt;BR /&gt;
It was  a link that died  &lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=13306&amp;amp;highlight=ashrae#13306" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... hrae#13306"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=13306&amp;amp;highlight=ashrae#13306&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;	&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ASHRAE  90.1 delegates to the mechanical engineers these aspect of the design compliance:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
• envelopes and fenestration&lt;BR /&gt;
• lighting and lighting controls&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I hope AC 10 will address this totally neglected aspect. Soon one will have no choice but to move to a BIM package that is built around the energy codes.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:55:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28292#M2426</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-17T01:55:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy Compliance</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28293#M2427</link>
      <description>Ontario, Canada has had ASHRAE 90.1 requirements incorporated in the Building Code since about 1995. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I took a course on compliance when I was a building inspector. Funny to that the course was designed for architects and engineers and there were only about oneof each in a class of about 30. BTW it was a freebee put on by then Ontario Hydro.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the course material and manual there was software that helped analyze  the building on the prescriptive / and or optional paths. I think I still may have a copy of both the lighting and envelope programs but they are probably out of date...considering that they ran under DOS....</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28293#M2427</guid>
      <dc:creator>gpowless</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-17T02:23:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy Compliance</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28294#M2428</link>
      <description>This standard is 90.1– 1999 and no the old 90.1-1989&lt;BR /&gt;
Believe me is not a cakewalk. Of course the DOE COM-Check works if design or $$ is not a concern. The next standard being developed by the DOE is so strict that no Architect will be able to bring a building in budget or design one without addressing envelope concerns from start. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I know most of this list is preoccupied by pretty images and tools to express them but I am warning the writing is on the wall , we are fast approaching the moment we must be able to design or be reduced to fashion consultants.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Energy-Compliance/m-p/28294#M2428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-17T02:54:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

