<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Experiences with ArchiStair 2.0 in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202324#M25184</link>
    <description>Hi Don,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I really like ArchiStair 2.0 - much more so than 1.0.  The level of control, design flexibility, and the editable hotspots for adjusting things are great IMHO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What problem were you having with your stringers?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-15T17:57:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Experiences with ArchiStair 2.0</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202322#M25182</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I just bought ArchiStair 2.0 upgrading from 1.0.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It appears to do everything I might need, but despite the videos, I find&lt;BR /&gt;
the interface is less than intuitive. I also seem to be having problems with the stringers.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any of you out there use 2.0 (or 1.0) and care to share your impressions and experiences?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Don Lee&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202322#M25182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-07T04:02:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Experiences with ArchiStair 2.0</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202323#M25183</link>
      <description>Thought I would bump this to the top.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Don Lee</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202323#M25183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-15T16:08:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Experiences with ArchiStair 2.0</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202324#M25184</link>
      <description>Hi Don,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I really like ArchiStair 2.0 - much more so than 1.0.  The level of control, design flexibility, and the editable hotspots for adjusting things are great IMHO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What problem were you having with your stringers?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202324#M25184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-15T17:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Experiences with ArchiStair 2.0</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202325#M25185</link>
      <description>Hi Karl:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thought I had posted a reply, but it didn't go through.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When I set the stringer to be 4" thick it became irregular in shape at the landing, but only on the inside corner of an L shaped stair. I sent the file to Fabrizio and he told me I had found a bug. Apparently, 2.0 was a major rewrite and this bug only occurs under specific conditions and he is working on a fix.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I admit to not being really great at cad, but to me the interface of Archistair 2.0 is not that easy. A large part of this is due to the fact that building a 3d stair with its many variables is a very complex thing. I did the rough tread layouts in Stairmaker and the rest in 2d for the moment. Fabrizio asked that I send him a sketch of the stair that I wanted and he would try to make it in Archistair. I have to say that Fabrizio has been very fast and detailed in his responses to my questions.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Part of my dilemma is that as a sole practitioner, I really don't have the time (or inclination) to juggle a number of different add-on programs that have protection keys and different interfaces. This is not meant as a direct criticism of Fabrizio, as they make great products, but rather a comment on ArchiCad in general.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Don Lee</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:30:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Experiences-with-ArchiStair-2-0/m-p/202325#M25185</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T19:30:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

