<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Possible xref bug? in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Possible-xref-bug/m-p/4716#M311</link>
    <description>eric&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
just one of a whole host of gripes i have with archiCAD's x-ref management!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
see the topic:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=126" target="_blank"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=126&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
much of the discussion takes place further through the tread . . .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
AFAIC it's a &lt;B&gt;B U G&lt;/B&gt; not a feature!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
~/archiben</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>__archiben</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-19T12:30:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible xref bug?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Possible-xref-bug/m-p/4715#M310</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Has anyone noticed that in 8.1 you can edit and even delete elements of an xref? If you update the xref everything reverts back to the contents of the external file.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Conversely, you cannot do the same with hotlinked modules. I wonder if this is a feature or a bug.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:14:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Possible-xref-bug/m-p/4715#M310</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-18T15:14:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible xref bug?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Possible-xref-bug/m-p/4716#M311</link>
      <description>eric&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
just one of a whole host of gripes i have with archiCAD's x-ref management!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
see the topic:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=126" target="_blank"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=126&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
much of the discussion takes place further through the tread . . .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
AFAIC it's a &lt;B&gt;B U G&lt;/B&gt; not a feature!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
~/archiben</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Possible-xref-bug/m-p/4716#M311</guid>
      <dc:creator>__archiben</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-19T12:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

