<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Classification in Germany in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256996#M33613</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;uisanata wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you. &lt;BR /&gt;
This is surprising. Do you think Uniclass would work ? Is it compatible enough ?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Well, nobody cares. Germany is pretty darn late with the BIM stuff.&lt;BR /&gt;
Heck, there is still a majority of offices using DumbCad... &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_rolleyes.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So, just use whatever suits you. Potential benefits are small, tho.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>runxel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-11T10:09:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Classification in Germany</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256992#M33609</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hello there.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is anyone familiar with the classification system used in Germany?&lt;BR /&gt;
I know the must have a DIN somewhere for BIM, could anyone point me in the right direction, please ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am looking for the equivalent of Uniclass, more specifically a XML file to import and use right away would be great . &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thank you.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256992#M33609</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ernest Atanasiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-08T12:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classification in Germany</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256993#M33610</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;uisanata wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;DIN somewhere for BIM&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
I'm afraid there is nothing like that.&lt;BR /&gt;
The closest you can get is DIN 276, I suppose.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I know some offices, which will organize around the "costs groups". But the DIN is not about BIM.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256993#M33610</guid>
      <dc:creator>runxel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-09T12:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classification in Germany</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256994#M33611</link>
      <description>Thank you. &lt;BR /&gt;
This is surprising. Do you think Uniclass would work ? Is it compatible enough ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256994#M33611</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ernest Atanasiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-11T09:11:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classification in Germany</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256995#M33612</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="https://www.vdi.de/technik/fachthemen/bauen-und-gebaeudetechnik/querschnittsthemen-der-vdi-gbg/koordinierungskreis-bim/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="https://www.vdi.de/technik/fachthemen/b ... kreis-bim/"&gt;https://www.vdi.de/technik/fachthemen/bauen-und-gebaeudetechnik/querschnittsthemen-der-vdi-gbg/koordinierungskreis-bim/&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt; is this what you are looking for?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The first (and last) time I did some research into German building regulations and such I gave up. I'm glad that one potential trip across the border for that project was put on hold. Seems to be a LOT of local level stuff going on and it is not easy to find out. My German pretty much being Dutch with a thick accent doesn't help though...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256995#M33612</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erwin Edel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-11T09:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classification in Germany</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256996#M33613</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;uisanata wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you. &lt;BR /&gt;
This is surprising. Do you think Uniclass would work ? Is it compatible enough ?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Well, nobody cares. Germany is pretty darn late with the BIM stuff.&lt;BR /&gt;
Heck, there is still a majority of offices using DumbCad... &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_rolleyes.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So, just use whatever suits you. Potential benefits are small, tho.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256996#M33613</guid>
      <dc:creator>runxel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-11T10:09:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classification in Germany</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256997#M33614</link>
      <description>A few years back we did an adaptation of our mACT - ARCHICAD template based on DIN276 (which btw is surprisingly similar to the Australian NATSPEC system). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway yes there seems to be not much else to go by.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Btw. IMHO the only real thing to go by is to get your IFC classifications right - until GRAPHISOFT changes their mapping approach with the next version of ARCHICAD.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Classification-in-Germany/m-p/256997#M33614</guid>
      <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-11T11:58:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

