<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Acrobat vs Preview in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Acrobat-vs-Preview/m-p/260309#M34059</link>
    <description>I don't see this as a wish, but personally I usually prefer Preview but sometimes I find it incredible slow because I think of it's smoothing techniques (anti-aliasing I guess). So for a complex vector file, panning/zooming is far too slow (and unworkable). Whilst Acrobat doesn't smooth vectors as nicely, it is noticeable faster as a result.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So I mostly use Preview, but it's nice to have Acrobat there as a backup.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James B</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-10T09:12:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Acrobat vs Preview</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Acrobat-vs-Preview/m-p/260308#M34058</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Mac users - what application do you prefer to open your PDF files in?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We've been installing Acrobat Pro for years, but taking a closer look, all the "pro" features that we need are now basically possible with Preview (combine pages, rotate, some light annotation). I would like to ditch Acrobat completely (Preview is just so much more intuitive, versatile, easier to print from, has faster search and is free).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm trying to anticipate any deal breakers for switching to Preview - some users claim that Acrobat is "more precise" when displaying PDFs, but I have no idea what that actually means, nor do I have any empirical evidence of it being the case (I suspect it's just a historical thing).&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:34:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Acrobat-vs-Preview/m-p/260308#M34058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-10T08:34:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Acrobat vs Preview</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Acrobat-vs-Preview/m-p/260309#M34059</link>
      <description>I don't see this as a wish, but personally I usually prefer Preview but sometimes I find it incredible slow because I think of it's smoothing techniques (anti-aliasing I guess). So for a complex vector file, panning/zooming is far too slow (and unworkable). Whilst Acrobat doesn't smooth vectors as nicely, it is noticeable faster as a result.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So I mostly use Preview, but it's nice to have Acrobat there as a backup.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Acrobat-vs-Preview/m-p/260309#M34059</guid>
      <dc:creator>James B</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-10T09:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

