<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DWG Xref vs. Merge, Diffrent Behaver? in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/DWG-Xref-vs-Merge-Diffrent-Behaver/m-p/43354#M3876</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there any reason why I am getting different behavior with attaching DWG as Xref vs. Merging in the DWG files? With merge I get accurate line types and width, I using the same translator.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Joseph Harouni&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-10-18T23:00:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DWG Xref vs. Merge, Diffrent Behaver?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/DWG-Xref-vs-Merge-Diffrent-Behaver/m-p/43354#M3876</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there any reason why I am getting different behavior with attaching DWG as Xref vs. Merging in the DWG files? With merge I get accurate line types and width, I using the same translator.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Joseph Harouni&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/DWG-Xref-vs-Merge-Diffrent-Behaver/m-p/43354#M3876</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-18T23:00:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

