<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Archicad Classification v 2.0 in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Archicad-Classification-v-2-0/m-p/369821#M41927</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm adding one more plank in the litany of complaints about functionality in our primary platform.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We're starting work on a big project with 4 European architects and intend to use GS DK's LCA Calculation engine. I downloaded a copy of the DK .tpl file and discovered that their version of the standard Classification system has considerably more entries than the North American (aka USA) version.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we're trying to do data exchange with offshore partners, surely Archicad should offer transparent assistance in this venture. Every copy of Archicad should have identical core functionality.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why on earth would GS release different - I say 'different', not 'localized' - versions of this core piece of the tool?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 09:41:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Aaron Bourgoin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-30T09:41:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Archicad Classification v 2.0</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Archicad-Classification-v-2-0/m-p/369821#M41927</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm adding one more plank in the litany of complaints about functionality in our primary platform.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We're starting work on a big project with 4 European architects and intend to use GS DK's LCA Calculation engine. I downloaded a copy of the DK .tpl file and discovered that their version of the standard Classification system has considerably more entries than the North American (aka USA) version.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we're trying to do data exchange with offshore partners, surely Archicad should offer transparent assistance in this venture. Every copy of Archicad should have identical core functionality.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why on earth would GS release different - I say 'different', not 'localized' - versions of this core piece of the tool?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 09:41:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Archicad-Classification-v-2-0/m-p/369821#M41927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Bourgoin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T09:41:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

