<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IFC 2x3 beta ac9 &amp;amp; 10 in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/IFC-2x3-beta-ac9-amp-10/m-p/52385#M4802</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;There is a very different standard of conversion between the ifc implementation between 9 and 10. The result from the 9 version is usable and shows, on the example I have, all the bracing and main steel from a tekla model, but the 10 version seems to omit bracing items and comes up with some really strange solid objects where the bracing should be!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris Phillips</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-04T13:16:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IFC 2x3 beta ac9 &amp; 10</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/IFC-2x3-beta-ac9-amp-10/m-p/52385#M4802</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;There is a very different standard of conversion between the ifc implementation between 9 and 10. The result from the 9 version is usable and shows, on the example I have, all the bracing and main steel from a tekla model, but the 10 version seems to omit bracing items and comes up with some really strange solid objects where the bracing should be!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/IFC-2x3-beta-ac9-amp-10/m-p/52385#M4802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris Phillips</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-04T13:16:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

