<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Importing multiple Archicad Objects into Single ACAD Drawing in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Importing-multiple-Archicad-Objects-into-Single-ACAD-Drawing/m-p/64016#M5997</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Does any one out there know how to import multiple Archicad defined objects into Autocad without running into SECTELEM_## collisions.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
[Client is not Archicad literate and all redlining is done through AutodCAD]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Translations from Archicad work as expected but everytime I try to merge two different aspects (for example) elevations into one Autocad drawing,  I run into one elevation having defined the block elements by the Archicad translator and systematically naming each element with the following convention SECTELEM_01....SECTELEM_02...SECTELEM_03.... and so on.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When I try to import another archicad translated drawing into the same Autocad drawing it tells me that:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Duplicate definition of block SECTELEM_01  ignored&lt;BR /&gt;
Duplicate definition of block SECTELEM_02  ignored&lt;BR /&gt;
Duplicate definition of block SECTELEM_03  ignored&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
which results in a combined drawing that is misssing all the elements of drawing #2 that was already defined in drawing #1.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
[See attached pic.]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is the case in both v9 &amp;amp; v10... A better solution to this naming convention would be to randomize these block/element names so that the changes of collisions would be convention to very small.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
(There is a dirty way around this issue by exploding eveything in the second drawing to line elements but this only creates a huge mess if using fill patterns)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would appreciate any suggestion to get around this collision issue.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/74996iADDDF4C4F14B44D9/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Collision Example.gif" title="Collision Example.gif" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-10T17:21:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Importing multiple Archicad Objects into Single ACAD Drawing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Importing-multiple-Archicad-Objects-into-Single-ACAD-Drawing/m-p/64016#M5997</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Does any one out there know how to import multiple Archicad defined objects into Autocad without running into SECTELEM_## collisions.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
[Client is not Archicad literate and all redlining is done through AutodCAD]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Translations from Archicad work as expected but everytime I try to merge two different aspects (for example) elevations into one Autocad drawing,  I run into one elevation having defined the block elements by the Archicad translator and systematically naming each element with the following convention SECTELEM_01....SECTELEM_02...SECTELEM_03.... and so on.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When I try to import another archicad translated drawing into the same Autocad drawing it tells me that:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Duplicate definition of block SECTELEM_01  ignored&lt;BR /&gt;
Duplicate definition of block SECTELEM_02  ignored&lt;BR /&gt;
Duplicate definition of block SECTELEM_03  ignored&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
which results in a combined drawing that is misssing all the elements of drawing #2 that was already defined in drawing #1.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
[See attached pic.]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is the case in both v9 &amp;amp; v10... A better solution to this naming convention would be to randomize these block/element names so that the changes of collisions would be convention to very small.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
(There is a dirty way around this issue by exploding eveything in the second drawing to line elements but this only creates a huge mess if using fill patterns)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would appreciate any suggestion to get around this collision issue.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/74996iADDDF4C4F14B44D9/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Collision Example.gif" title="Collision Example.gif" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Importing-multiple-Archicad-Objects-into-Single-ACAD-Drawing/m-p/64016#M5997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-10T17:21:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

