https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Drawing-details/m-p/76031#M7393 <DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"><T>I went to a demo of AC11 last week and saw how one can use a live virtual trace under a 2D details. It is often necessary to separate components to show how they go together and this cannot be done in 3D. <BR /> <BR /> I asked my office Revit guru how R managed this and it does so brilliantly. On the live model, one can separate the components and R keeps the separated views linked to the true view. Much better than AC's method I think. Revit seems to really understand how drawing are made - and they don't get sidetracked to the same extent with esoteric features that good look good but don't contibute to productivity. The more I see R, the more impressed I am. <BR /> <BR /> AC11 will have to be very good indeed to hold its market share.</T></DIV> Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:40:30 GMT KeesW 2007-06-17T12:40:30Z https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Drawing-details/m-p/76031#M7393 <DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"><T>I went to a demo of AC11 last week and saw how one can use a live virtual trace under a 2D details. It is often necessary to separate components to show how they go together and this cannot be done in 3D. <BR /> <BR /> I asked my office Revit guru how R managed this and it does so brilliantly. On the live model, one can separate the components and R keeps the separated views linked to the true view. Much better than AC's method I think. Revit seems to really understand how drawing are made - and they don't get sidetracked to the same extent with esoteric features that good look good but don't contibute to productivity. The more I see R, the more impressed I am. <BR /> <BR /> AC11 will have to be very good indeed to hold its market share.</T></DIV> Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:40:30 GMT https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Drawing-details/m-p/76031#M7393 KeesW 2007-06-17T12:40:30Z