<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Door and Window Builder vs. ArchiGlazing in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78326#M7679</link>
    <description>Yes -- thanks -- that does make a difference -- LJY</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-23T18:22:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Door and Window Builder vs. ArchiGlazing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78324#M7677</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Can anyone recommend one over the other? &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
It appears that ArchiGlazing is a good tool for one doing a lot of custom curtainwall/storefront framing, and Door and Window Builder would satisfy the need for just about any punched opening imaginable.  If the curtainwall/storefront objects are not significantly improved with AC10, we will have no choice but to purchase one of these add-ons...&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:02:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78324#M7677</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-23T18:02:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Door and Window Builder vs. ArchiGlazing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78325#M7678</link>
      <description>One major difference is that ArchiGlazing is an add-on and must be purchased and  installed on each machine with its own auth codes while D&amp;amp;WB is an object kit that you only need to buy once for the office and place in a common library.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It's not related to the features of either one, but can seriously affect the cost if you have a lot of users.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78325#M7678</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-23T18:19:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Door and Window Builder vs. ArchiGlazing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78326#M7679</link>
      <description>Yes -- thanks -- that does make a difference -- LJY</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78326#M7679</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-23T18:22:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Door and Window Builder vs. ArchiGlazing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78327#M7680</link>
      <description>Not sure about ArchiGlazing, but D&amp;amp;WB has some killer scheduling capabilities!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Link.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:30:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Door-and-Window-Builder-vs-ArchiGlazing/m-p/78327#M7680</guid>
      <dc:creator>Link</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-24T00:30:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

