<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Xeon Chip - Quad vs. Dual in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106893#M12802</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Jay wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Also what is a good Bus speed?&lt;BR /&gt;
.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

If you mean the Front Side Bus speed of the processor, then 1066 MHz or even 1333 MHz processors are available, if I am correct. The faster the better.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-18T21:07:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Xeon Chip - Quad vs. Dual</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106891#M12800</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I am looking at getting a new Desktop system. previously we have been mostly laptop based. I have not been one to get "cutting" edge systems, but the guy at dell are mostly pushing the Quad Core Xeon ($300 more than the Dual Core. Any opinions?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also what is a good Bus speed?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And as far as Graphics cards a 256MB card is $430 more than a 128MB.&lt;BR /&gt;
I believe that my current ATI Radeon 9600 Pro Turbo in my laptop has 128MB. Worth the upgrade?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And last - 4GB Ram is $320 more than 2GB. Currently I am running a system with 1GB.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106891#M12800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T15:07:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Xeon Chip - Qaud vs. Dual</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106892#M12801</link>
      <description>Without expressing the sentiment that if you don't get the Quad you won't be a man, i can offer some guidance for the video:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Get the big card. It will support larger OpenGL windows and make smoother navigations. But that 256 card seems expensive. Are there cheaper alternatives with just as much ram?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Get the 4 Gigamegs.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106892#M12801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T18:26:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Xeon Chip - Quad vs. Dual</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106893#M12802</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Jay wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Also what is a good Bus speed?&lt;BR /&gt;
.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

If you mean the Front Side Bus speed of the processor, then 1066 MHz or even 1333 MHz processors are available, if I am correct. The faster the better.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Xeon-Chip-Quad-vs-Dual/m-p/106893#M12802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-18T21:07:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

