<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Vista in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118822#M14062</link>
    <description>Basically, I would only consider running Vista on at least 4Gb or RAM, and seeing as you need Vista-64 to do that, then I would only ever consider Vista-64.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't know why people persist in selling machines with 32-bit operating systems on them. 64-bit should be standard with the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;option&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; of 32-bit if you know that for some reason you can't use 64.&lt;BR /&gt;
Sorry I wasn't clear. I've been using 64bit OSes for the last several years and have never looked back.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ci-JoshOs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T22:30:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118815#M14055</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm looking at buying a new laptop. I seem to recall in the past that certain individuals had problems with vista. I was wondering, now that Vista's been out for a while, if anyone has any input as to any compatibility issues. I'm using XP Pro now and AC 11. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Doug&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118815#M14055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-15T20:10:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118816#M14056</link>
      <description>Most people complain about driver issues, Doug. You might want to check if all your peripherals have working drivers for Vista.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118816#M14056</guid>
      <dc:creator>vistasp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-16T03:23:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118817#M14057</link>
      <description>the only problems are unavailable drivers for old/weird peripherals, and underpowered hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Don't bother with vista unless you have at least 2 cores at over 2.5Ghz, at least 4Gb of RAM, and a decent Graphics Card.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This thing here would easily outperform most Workstation desktop machines. Just throw in some more RAM:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm/WF06b/321957-321957-64295-3329741-3329741-3784202-3817622.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm/WF06b/321957-321957-64295-3329741-3329741-3784202-3817622.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&amp;lt;LINK_TEXT text=&amp;quot;http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm ... 17622.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm/WF06b/321957-321957-64295-3329741-3329741-3784202-3817622.html&amp;lt;/LINK_TEXT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;e&amp;gt;"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm ... 17622.html"&gt;http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm/WF06b/321957-321957-64295-3329741-3329741-3784202-3817622.html&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've been using Vista for a couple of months now and I'm very happy with it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:52:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118817#M14057</guid>
      <dc:creator>ci-JoshOs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-24T21:52:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118818#M14058</link>
      <description>4thorns (and others)&lt;BR /&gt;
It's not just the economy that's driving the heavy discounts I'm seeing.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you haven't bought yet and can wait a bit, a whole new slue of HP lap tops with quad cores is about the hit the market.&lt;BR /&gt;
Right after they get rid of all the duo's at xmas and Jan "white" sales.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The heavy discounts tipped me off to ask the right questions at Frys and others.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bier</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:33:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118818#M14058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-25T03:33:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118819#M14059</link>
      <description>Henry&lt;BR /&gt;
What is the go with 4GB RAM for Vista? I thought that 32 bit processors could only handle 3GB - am I mistaken?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118819#M14059</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeesW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-01T12:49:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118820#M14060</link>
      <description>Your processor is 64-bit.&lt;BR /&gt;
According to Wikipedia (&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit&amp;lt;e&amp;gt;"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;), the following processors are all 64-bit:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
# AMD's AMD64 extensions (used in Athlon 64, Opteron, Sempron, Turion 64 and Phenom processors)&lt;BR /&gt;
# Intel's Intel 64 extensions (used in newer Celeron, Pentium 4, Pentium D, Xeon, and Core 2 processors&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you are also using 64-bit Vista then that should be fine.&lt;BR /&gt;
I am currently using Vista 32-bit and the system sees only 3.2 GB of RAM.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118820#M14060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-01T14:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118821#M14061</link>
      <description>I know what I've got and that it uses the full 4GB RAM. HenryPootel remarked that one should get 4GB RAM, without referring to the OS and I was puzzled. My wife is looking buying a Dell or Mac laptop (she does heavy duty editing and desktop publishing) and Dell are offering 4GB installed, or making it a cheap option, for normal non-64 bit Vista. I just wondered why one would want 4GB if the OS only uses 3.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118821#M14061</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeesW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-01T22:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118822#M14062</link>
      <description>Basically, I would only consider running Vista on at least 4Gb or RAM, and seeing as you need Vista-64 to do that, then I would only ever consider Vista-64.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't know why people persist in selling machines with 32-bit operating systems on them. 64-bit should be standard with the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;option&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; of 32-bit if you know that for some reason you can't use 64.&lt;BR /&gt;
Sorry I wasn't clear. I've been using 64bit OSes for the last several years and have never looked back.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118822#M14062</guid>
      <dc:creator>ci-JoshOs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-01T22:30:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118823#M14063</link>
      <description>I'm currently running AC11 and am about to get a new computer, if I get Vista 64Bit will it work ok with AC11? Likely computer specs are below, what do you think?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Intel S775 Core 2 Q9550 2.83GHz Quad-Core CPU &lt;BR /&gt;
ASUS S775 P5Q-SE-R Core 2 Motherboard &lt;BR /&gt;
DDR2 4GB Geil 800MHz Dual Channel DDR2 Kit &lt;BR /&gt;
Internal All-in-1 Memory Card Reader Black &lt;BR /&gt;
500GB Seagate 7200rpm 32M Serial ATA HDD &lt;BR /&gt;
Leadtek nVidia Quadro FX570 PCIe Video Card &lt;BR /&gt;
Antec Three Hundred Case (No PS) &lt;BR /&gt;
Seventeam 620W ST-620PAF Power Supply &lt;BR /&gt;
Logitech Cordless Desktop MX-5500 Revolution &lt;BR /&gt;
LG 22x DVD Burner SATA Black OEM &lt;BR /&gt;
Integrated Sound Card &lt;BR /&gt;
Gigabyte GP-S4600 Speakers &lt;BR /&gt;
Integrated Gigabit Network Connection &lt;BR /&gt;
MS Windows Vista Business 64bit OEM &lt;BR /&gt;
FDD/Card Reader Mount 3.5inch To 5.25inch Black</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118823#M14063</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-02T01:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118824#M14064</link>
      <description>Yes, It'll work fine, but you'll need ArchiCAD 12 to be able to use all 4 cores.&lt;BR /&gt;
It's worth the upgrade just for the speed boost.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118824#M14064</guid>
      <dc:creator>ci-JoshOs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-02T01:37:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118825#M14065</link>
      <description>Thanks mate, will be upgrading to AC12 in the next couple of months.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:47:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118825#M14065</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-02T04:47:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118826#M14066</link>
      <description>Remember that Vista 64 is unable to use the VR functions within ArchiCad. Apparently Apple (the inventors of VR) haven't yet written the drivers to make it work with 64 bit window OS's. And Graphisoft obviously don't have, or don't use, enough clout to make them do so.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:10:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118826#M14066</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeesW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T12:10:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118827#M14067</link>
      <description>For the VR take in consideration that Apple is writing the next, full 64 bit version of Quicktime (Quicktime X if I remember correctly) that will be released sometime this year with the 10.6 upgrade. That might be why there has not being any improvements on the older version.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118827#M14067</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T13:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vista</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118828#M14068</link>
      <description>Maybe, but we have been waiting about 4 years for a 64-bit edition of Quicktime. I hope it's worth it.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:42:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Vista/m-p/118828#M14068</guid>
      <dc:creator>ci-JoshOs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-08T19:42:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

