<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Core envy (mac) ... in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Core-envy-mac/m-p/119342#M14103</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;This has been partly discussed elsewhere however with the new core aware archicad 12 I'm just wondering about real word differences between a tricked out Macbook Pro (say 2.4Ghz 6/320-7200) or a Mac Pro 8 core (say 2.8Ghz 8/4xRAID @ 7200)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did a crippled demo at the Apple Store &amp;amp; could only use about 20% of the horsepower running 4 archicads (only 1 would render) off an external FW400 drive (slow) nor being able to run VirtualBox - so it was tough to tell...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
RAID uses horseys too...  Xbench test results only show roughly a 2x benefit &amp;amp; it was clear that archicad when rendering had some bottleneck in my demo to only use 20% capacity...? An external lappy RAID (2x) is also an option... &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any anecdotal insights welcome! Thx!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>March_ Bruce</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:21:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Core envy (mac) ...</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Core-envy-mac/m-p/119342#M14103</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;This has been partly discussed elsewhere however with the new core aware archicad 12 I'm just wondering about real word differences between a tricked out Macbook Pro (say 2.4Ghz 6/320-7200) or a Mac Pro 8 core (say 2.8Ghz 8/4xRAID @ 7200)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did a crippled demo at the Apple Store &amp;amp; could only use about 20% of the horsepower running 4 archicads (only 1 would render) off an external FW400 drive (slow) nor being able to run VirtualBox - so it was tough to tell...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
RAID uses horseys too...  Xbench test results only show roughly a 2x benefit &amp;amp; it was clear that archicad when rendering had some bottleneck in my demo to only use 20% capacity...? An external lappy RAID (2x) is also an option... &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any anecdotal insights welcome! Thx!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Core-envy-mac/m-p/119342#M14103</guid>
      <dc:creator>March_ Bruce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:21:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core envy (mac) ...</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Core-envy-mac/m-p/119343#M14104</link>
      <description>i know someone using mac pro with 8 cores, i dunno the exact configuration in his machine&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
but he told me that the 3d navigation is significantly faster than previous version.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:03:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Core-envy-mac/m-p/119343#M14104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T03:03:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

