<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Windows Vista vs. XP Pro in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121486#M14317</link>
    <description>I am using XP32, Vista32 and Vista64 in VM and Boot Camp with no problems (at least not any more than is normally to be expected with Windows). I am also using very new hardware and software and totally clean installs; no legacy issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I do like some of the new features in Vista. For one it's not as butt-ugly as XP out of the box (I always reset XP to look like Win2K every time I install it). Probably by SP2 Vista will be the all around better choice (and probably the only one as stocks of XP are disappearing fast).</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-10T21:02:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Vista vs. XP Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121482#M14313</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;We are about to buy a new office laptop and need to know if we should stick with XP or go with Vista. I have heard lots of problems with Vista and not sure how well it runs ArchitCAD 11?  &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
Thoughts?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121482#M14313</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-30T14:04:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows Vista vs. XP Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121483#M14314</link>
      <description>I would stick with XP Pro. I have also heard about problems with AC 10 and older. AC 11 is supposed to be OK with Vista but if you need to use any of the older versions you would be hooped.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121483#M14314</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Hoffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-30T16:44:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows Vista vs. XP Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121484#M14315</link>
      <description>I just bought a new laptop and am very happy with it.  I think it's the kind that has the "X" thing in it and not the vista thingy.  I'd stick with the X thing if I was you.....</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121484#M14315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chazz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-30T19:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows Vista vs. XP Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121485#M14316</link>
      <description>Best O.S. for Archicad Is : WINDOWS 2003 SERVER ENTERPRISE &lt;BR /&gt;
tweaked with settings not for servers but for workstations.&lt;BR /&gt;
Greatest speed compared to XP an Vista ....without bells and whistles&lt;BR /&gt;
but fast and responsive like a race car  . It,s the best and mature operating system even you have a slow computer. It give you the chance to ad to your system more then 4 gb of ram (how much your motherboard support ) and is a 32 bit os not like xp 64 .&lt;BR /&gt;
At the address :&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;A href="http://www.msfn.org/win2k3/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.msfn.org/win2k3/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
you will find a great guide how to convert your Windows Server 2003... &lt;BR /&gt;
to a Workstation Os for every desktop pc !</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121485#M14316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-10T18:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows Vista vs. XP Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121486#M14317</link>
      <description>I am using XP32, Vista32 and Vista64 in VM and Boot Camp with no problems (at least not any more than is normally to be expected with Windows). I am also using very new hardware and software and totally clean installs; no legacy issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I do like some of the new features in Vista. For one it's not as butt-ugly as XP out of the box (I always reset XP to look like Win2K every time I install it). Probably by SP2 Vista will be the all around better choice (and probably the only one as stocks of XP are disappearing fast).</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Windows-Vista-vs-XP-Pro/m-p/121486#M14317</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-10T21:02:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

