<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AC 15 graphic card testing question. a little ambiguous. in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135840#M15713</link>
    <description>I would suppose that the reason they give the same performance is because the performance bottleneck is not the GPU. So all these cards are powerful enough for ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
As far as I know ArchiCAD does not require such huge GPU resources like games do.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T12:42:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AC 15 graphic card testing question. a little ambiguous.?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135839#M15712</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;hi to all.&lt;BR /&gt;
sorry for my bad english, hope you'll understand.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i'm following this forum for long time and i've read a lot of threads and watched AC dream machine video tutorial because i'm going to build a new machine for my friend.&lt;BR /&gt;
but i have to ask something to you, so i decided to register and post my question.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ok, i've seen archicad tested video cards, and i'm pleased to see gamers cards in your list.&lt;BR /&gt;
i think i'll build a win7 machine, and i've seen that almost all cards reaches the same performances with AC15.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.archicadwiki.com/VideoCardsForArchiCAD15" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.archicadwiki.com/VideoCardsForArchiCAD15&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
and that's why i'm a bit confused:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
radeon 6850, 1.1 relative fps&lt;BR /&gt;
nvidia gtx460, 1.1 relative fps.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
radeon 6850, mid-range&lt;BR /&gt;
nvidia gtx460, high-end.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
why, they can run AC at the same speed?? why this difference?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thank to all will help me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
post scriptum: &lt;BR /&gt;
are really quadros o firepros more accurate in drawings in archicad?&lt;BR /&gt;
if not, nvidia gt220 (10x cheaper then a quadro) is the best bang for the buck card.&lt;BR /&gt;
gt220 is also mentioned in a dream machine in graphisoft dream machine tutorial, right?&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:41:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135839#M15712</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-01T07:41:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC 15 graphic card testing question. a little ambiguous.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135840#M15713</link>
      <description>I would suppose that the reason they give the same performance is because the performance bottleneck is not the GPU. So all these cards are powerful enough for ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
As far as I know ArchiCAD does not require such huge GPU resources like games do.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135840#M15713</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-01T12:42:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC 15 graphic card testing question. a little ambiguous.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135841#M15714</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;laszlonagy wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I would suppose that the reason they give the same performance is because the performance bottleneck is not the GPU. So all these cards are powerful enough for ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
As far as I know ArchiCAD does not require such huge GPU resources like games do.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

thankyou lazlo.&lt;BR /&gt;
ok, CPU bottleneck seem reasonable.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i'm not going to buy ultra high-end VGA for AC use, that's for sure &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
and can you explain why all atis are in mid-range and nvidias in high-end (except for few cards)?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
is it a driver related question?&lt;BR /&gt;
i've seen that atis card were buggy, but it was 3 years ago, and now they are "certified".&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.archicadwiki.com/Bugs/Tracker%20problem%20with%20ATI%20videocards" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.archicadwiki.com/Bugs/Tracke ... videocards"&gt;http://www.archicadwiki.com/Bugs/Tracker%20problem%20with%20ATI%20videocards&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:26:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135841#M15714</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-01T14:26:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC 15 graphic card testing question. a little ambiguous.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135842#M15715</link>
      <description>I am not sure about this mid-range high-end thing.&lt;BR /&gt;
I consider the AMD Radeon 6850 pretty high-end, both in terms of price and performance.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135842#M15715</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-02T10:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC 15 graphic card testing question. a little ambiguous.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135843#M15716</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;laszlonagy wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I am not sure about this mid-range high-end thing.&lt;BR /&gt;
I consider the AMD Radeon 6850 pretty high-end, both in terms of price and performance.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

This is exactly what i think..&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've seen that graphic hardware testing results are uploaded by GregKmethy.&lt;BR /&gt;
I'll ask to him and i'll post the answer, maybe it will be useful for someone else&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thankyou lazlo, i apreciated your help.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-15-graphic-card-testing-question-a-little-ambiguous/m-p/135843#M15716</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-02T11:16:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

