<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ATI VS NVIDIA 2D CRISP IMAGE in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/ATI-VS-NVIDIA-2D-CRISP-IMAGE/m-p/14819#M1800</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Anybody can tell me if is better to use ati or nvidia to have better 2d images (crisp) on my screen from tour experience&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:29:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-26T08:29:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ATI VS NVIDIA 2D CRISP IMAGE</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/ATI-VS-NVIDIA-2D-CRISP-IMAGE/m-p/14819#M1800</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Anybody can tell me if is better to use ati or nvidia to have better 2d images (crisp) on my screen from tour experience&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:29:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/ATI-VS-NVIDIA-2D-CRISP-IMAGE/m-p/14819#M1800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-26T08:29:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

