<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: &amp;quot;Recommended Video Cards&amp;quot; - Workstation vs Gam in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198926#M21221</link>
    <description>I would concur with this statement. It's hard to know what the most cost effective solution would be. I'm quite excited with the release of the Version 18. But my graphics/video card needs upgrading. As do our companies three other licenses and this could end up being costly if we don't get it right.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 02:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-14T02:18:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Recommended Video Cards" - Workstation vs Gaming Cards</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198925#M21220</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;The 'Recommended Video Cards' page for ArchiCAD card comparisons are always between workstation cards ranging in the $400-$800+ range against gaming cards that run in the $80-$150 range.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
These comparisons need to be between cards of the same price range in order to get a real metric for determining the card to buy.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198925#M21220</guid>
      <dc:creator>MMontgomery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-09T19:44:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Recommended Video Cards" - Workstation vs Gam</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198926#M21221</link>
      <description>I would concur with this statement. It's hard to know what the most cost effective solution would be. I'm quite excited with the release of the Version 18. But my graphics/video card needs upgrading. As do our companies three other licenses and this could end up being costly if we don't get it right.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 02:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198926#M21221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T02:18:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Recommended Video Cards" - Workstation vs Gam</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198927#M21222</link>
      <description>You are also strugling to get direct and any real answer about what to buy and what to upgrade?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It seems like forever to find out and buyers are just blindly buying and hoping for it to work decently.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My recent discovery is, that graphisoft states that a4 year old used 50€ GTX 560 is faster than a new 600€ K2200 and at the same time the gtx 750 being 5x slower than both of them while having the same specs and architecture.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/quot-Recommended-Video-Cards-quot-Workstation-vs-Gaming-Cards/m-p/198927#M21222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-07T16:13:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

