<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: better?? (Xeon  OR  P$4) in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18082#M2249</link>
    <description>did anyone test Xeon?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-30T18:32:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>better?? (Xeon  OR  P$4)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18081#M2248</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;which is the better?&lt;BR /&gt;
xeon 3.2   or p4 3.2 ,,why?&lt;BR /&gt;
the rendering time will effect ,or not?&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18081#M2248</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-29T02:23:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: better?? (Xeon  OR  P$4)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18082#M2249</link>
      <description>did anyone test Xeon?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18082#M2249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-30T18:32:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: better?? (Xeon  OR  P$4)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18083#M2250</link>
      <description>My system has a xeon processor and I am satisfied with it's performance.  I don't know how it compares with the P4, though.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18083#M2250</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Dolbee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-31T13:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: better?? (Xeon  OR  P$4)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18084#M2251</link>
      <description>I think the Xeon is positioned as a server processor, which in terms of processor infrastructure means that it has more cache (fast temporary storage in the processor). That makes it faster because the fast processor does not have to wait as much for "slower" system components, like data coming from the memory, and such things.&lt;BR /&gt;
So the Xeon should perforn better, but it is more expensive, I think. I wonder if the extra money is worth the additional cost.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/better-Xeon-OR-P-4/m-p/18084#M2251</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-07T01:00:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

