<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fundemental flaw with gridline offset in Elevations in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Fundemental-flaw-with-gridline-offset-in-Elevations/m-p/276121#M28616</link>
    <description>There is interesting solution that many ArchiCAD users might not know.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you select "Custom" from drop down menu instead of "General" in Section/Elevation tab in Gridline settings, then staggering and gridline height will apply only to this Elevation.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 21:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Podolsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-25T21:25:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fundemental flaw with gridline offset in Elevations</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Fundemental-flaw-with-gridline-offset-in-Elevations/m-p/276120#M28615</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;so I have found a pretty fundamental flaw with the gridline offset function when displaying gridlines in Elevations please refer to my attached screenshots below&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
East Elevation - I have shown the gridline B with a 700 offset (to the right towards Section Section Marker D) to avoid conflict with the Section E marker.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When I go to my West Elevation (which bear in mind is a mirror image) the gridline B marker is also shown offset to the right but this is incorrect the marker should be offset to the left  (away from marker D towards marker E as it was in my East Elev) instead the gridline overlaps marker E completely (as shown in screenshot with ghost turned on) towards Section Marker C (completely the wrong direction) if i proceed to correct this it will then make it display incorrectly back on the East Elevation (rinse and repeat) so I will have to patch and fill this with 2d elements or instead offset the section marker heads (hopefully i wont end up with the same issue as above) &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
edit: in the end I have extended the section marker so it is the only marker that doesnt line up with the others and kept gridline B without an offset, (not ideal) but the marker offset is not working correctly.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Fundemental-flaw-with-gridline-offset-in-Elevations/m-p/276120#M28615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-14T19:54:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fundemental flaw with gridline offset in Elevations</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Fundemental-flaw-with-gridline-offset-in-Elevations/m-p/276121#M28616</link>
      <description>There is interesting solution that many ArchiCAD users might not know.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you select "Custom" from drop down menu instead of "General" in Section/Elevation tab in Gridline settings, then staggering and gridline height will apply only to this Elevation.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 21:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Fundemental-flaw-with-gridline-offset-in-Elevations/m-p/276121#M28616</guid>
      <dc:creator>Podolsky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-25T21:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

