<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AC&amp;gt;PM problem with fills used as 'patches' in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33277#M4305</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Greg wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I use fills with a white pen to cover unwanted items - I could, say, cover an unwanted door in an elevation with the 'Stucco' fill with the background pen set to a white pen, 'Bring to Front' the fill and the door would be covered in AC and plotmaker - perfect for showing quick concept alternatives without unlinking the elevation to erase something.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Wow, I like this. Mind if I "borrow" your technique? I hadn't thought of this before, but sounds like a good way to keep elevations connected while also fully correct. And on a semi-related story (hope this is acceptable in... this thread), does AC preserve object order between saves? It didn't seem to be the case, but I could be wrong.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-04-21T19:34:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AC&gt;PM problem with fills used as 'patches'</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33274#M4302</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I use fills with a white pen to cover unwanted items - it has been a practice of mine since AC introduced 'Display Order.' (6.5?)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Since I installed build 2256, Plotmaker will not recognize these 'patches' unless I use Solid Fill with a white pen. Before 2256 I could, say, cover an unwanted door in an elevation with the 'Stucco' fill with the background pen set to a white pen, 'Bring to Front' the fill and the door would be covered in AC and plotmaker - perfect for showing quick concept alternatives without unlinking the elevation to erase something.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This does not seem to be an option anymore. Everything looks OK in AC, but when I open in PM, all white-penned fills are transparent except 'Solid' fill.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If this is a new "feature," it will torpedo my productivity - is it a bug? Did 2256 reset something in AC or PM that I haven't had to worry about since it's inception in V6.5? Please help.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33274#M4302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-20T17:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC&gt;PM problem with fills used as 'patches'</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33275#M4303</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Greg wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
This does not seem to be an option anymore. Everything looks OK in AC, but when I open in PM, all white-penned fills are transparent except 'Solid' fill.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If this is a new "feature," it will torpedo my productivity - is it a bug? Did 2256 reset something in AC or PM that I haven't had to worry about since it's inception in V6.5? Please help.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Did you try updating the drawings in PM?  I use fills to 'screen' items behind them - such as foundation walls - typically using the 25% dot fill or diagonal line fills with several thicknesses of white pen.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I opened a completed LBK from 8.1R1 in PM R2 and saw the same problem that you describe - my fills were gone/invisible and the foundation walls in my elevations were showing in their full and ugly glory... but after updating the drawing, all is fine.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33275#M4303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-20T17:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC&gt;PM problem with fills used as 'patches'</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33276#M4304</link>
      <description>Could be loosely related, but make sure that the preferences are set correctly in Plotmaker...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You don't want the one shown below if you intend to use the background color as white.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33276#M4304</guid>
      <dc:creator>vfrontiers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-20T18:37:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC&gt;PM problem with fills used as 'patches'</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33277#M4305</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Greg wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I use fills with a white pen to cover unwanted items - I could, say, cover an unwanted door in an elevation with the 'Stucco' fill with the background pen set to a white pen, 'Bring to Front' the fill and the door would be covered in AC and plotmaker - perfect for showing quick concept alternatives without unlinking the elevation to erase something.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Wow, I like this. Mind if I "borrow" your technique? I hadn't thought of this before, but sounds like a good way to keep elevations connected while also fully correct. And on a semi-related story (hope this is acceptable in... this thread), does AC preserve object order between saves? It didn't seem to be the case, but I could be wrong.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33277#M4305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-21T19:34:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC&gt;PM problem with fills used as 'patches'</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33278#M4306</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Sergio wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Wow, I like this. Mind if I "borrow" your technique?...And on a semi-related story (hope this is acceptable in... this thread), does AC preserve object order between saves? It didn't seem to be the case, but I could be wrong.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I use this technique all the time with the Air Space fill to cover and/or fix unwanted lines in plans &amp;amp; elevations - it's a quick and effective patch - you can draw on top, place library parts etc. as well, as long as the Display Order is correct -  I never use the Patch Tool anymore.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In my experience, AC has always preserved the object order [Display Order] between saves and when placing in PM.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks Duane and Karl - yes it was a preferences thing - all of these upgrades/versions/patches we've had to install and only now (2256) do the preferences change. Hmmm...what else have I missed/overlooked?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/AC-gt-PM-problem-with-fills-used-as-patches/m-p/33278#M4306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-21T20:02:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

