<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Elevation Change Symbol in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39667#M5102</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;David wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;(when I used this in my pre CAD days I would have put the hatching on the other side of the stepped line).&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Same here.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Steve</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Dolbee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-03-10T17:29:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Elevation Change Symbol</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39665#M5100</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this question.  I did see the "Any other not ArchiCAD related questions" subtitle so I thought that I'd ask here.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We are wondering what symbol convention other people are using for minor elevation changes and single steps.  I used to work for an architect who liked the symbol in the attached image.  I found it potentally confusing.  What are other people using to indicate a minor elevation change or a single step?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;
John&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8192i6418DE1118DFA57C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="elevation change.jpg" title="elevation change.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:22:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39665#M5100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-10T00:22:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Elevation Change Symbol</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39666#M5101</link>
      <description>John: &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
I have been using the Level Dimensioning Tool for placing elevation markers in plan that are associated with the slab for that level, even for 1 step (6") changes. This ensures that the marker reads the correct height if the slab level changes, in keeping with the BIM philosophy. I agree that the marker you show is ambiguous (when I used this in my pre CAD days I would have put the hatching on the other side of the stepped line). I have not had a problem with the Level Dimensioning markers being misread in the field, but I know local practices may differ. Hope this helps. &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
David</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39666#M5101</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Maudlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-10T14:02:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Elevation Change Symbol</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39667#M5102</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;David wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;(when I used this in my pre CAD days I would have put the hatching on the other side of the stepped line).&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Same here.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Elevation-Change-Symbol/m-p/39667#M5102</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Dolbee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-10T17:29:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

