<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Intel iMac impressions in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40165#M5140</link>
    <description>Thanks for the report Chris. I imagine large improvements with universal coding</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-08T12:25:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel iMac impressions</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40164#M5139</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Just purchased a 20" Intel iMac for use with ArchiCAD.  Special ordered it with optional 500 GB hard drive,  2 GB ram,  the 256 MB Video card.  Since it can now support the extended desktop and I can use my 23" Cinema display,  seemed like it might be an acceptable workstation vs. a Power Mac G5.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Since I work with various architects on a freelance basis,  I have been using a 17" Powerbook @ 1 Ghz with 1 GB ram with good results.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Running ArchiCAD in Rosetta emulation seems a bit faster than the 3 year old Powerbook.  Rerendering section and elevation views is faster,  and sketch renderings come up fast.  With the Activity Monitor window running,  I can see that both CPU chips are running,  averaging about 50 to 60% useage per core.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am very happy with this configuration and would recommend it.  The big hard drive is for my video work,  so probably isn't needed to run ArchiCAD.  I have an associate with a box stock 20" Intel iMac so I'll report back on the differences in speed vs. my optioned out version.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ArchiCAD has always crashed every so often for me,  and seems a bit touchier on the Intel box,  but still seems to run very acceptably with no odd glitches that I've noticed so far. &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
Looking forward to the Universal version of ArchiCAD !&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40164#M5139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-08T12:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel iMac impressions</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40165#M5140</link>
      <description>Thanks for the report Chris. I imagine large improvements with universal coding</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40165#M5140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-08T12:25:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel iMac impressions</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40166#M5141</link>
      <description>similar results here.  we found that once we added a lot of ram, performance took a HUGE step forward.  my guess is that Rosetta is a bit of a memory hog, and if you don't have enough to accommodate the emulation and the software, you're in for slow performance - not just with ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Wes</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Intel-iMac-impressions/m-p/40166#M5141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-08T13:15:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

