<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mac Quad Core in Installation &amp; update</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75465#M9092</link>
    <description>What's the price tag on one of those rigs gonna be?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ouch......Just the name sounds pricey. &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ok...I saw it on the Apple site : $ 3,299.00</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:02:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-11-14T14:02:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75464#M9091</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I know that Windows ArchiCAD isn't optimized for 64 bit computing, nor is it set up to use a dual processor, but does the same apply to Tiger? Would the quad core processing be a waste of time?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75464#M9091</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-08T19:38:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75465#M9092</link>
      <description>What's the price tag on one of those rigs gonna be?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ouch......Just the name sounds pricey. &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ok...I saw it on the Apple site : $ 3,299.00</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:02:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75465#M9092</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-14T14:02:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75466#M9093</link>
      <description>Any word on this?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I suddenly find myself needing a new machine, and would REALLY like one if the performance improvement in Archicad (and Lightworks) is there.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:39:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75466#M9093</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-06T02:39:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75467#M9094</link>
      <description>average benchmarks peg it @ 75% faster than the dual 2.5 that I bought 10 months ago and only $300 more &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_sad.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:41:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75467#M9094</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-06T04:41:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75468#M9095</link>
      <description>I saw the benchmarks, I'm looking for someone who actually has used it with Archicad.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Photohop and Unreal Tournament are exciting, but ultimatelty not directly relavant. What I really want to know is whether Lightworks can use all 4 processors or if it is limited to two.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:16:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75468#M9095</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-06T11:16:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75469#M9096</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;I know that Windows ArchiCAD isn't optimized for 64 bit computing&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

AC9 Build 2172 will recognize more than 2 GB of Ram (i.e. 4Gb) on Windows boxes running the 64-Bit version of Windows. It requires a 64-bit version of the WIBU driver. The Amyuni Print driver won't run on 64-bit systems - so there's a catch.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75469#M9096</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Bourgoin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-06T16:33:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75470#M9097</link>
      <description>From Graphisoft:&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;LightWorks will use all 4 processors. However, do not expect rendering&lt;BR /&gt;
times to be divided by 4 compared to a single processor. Photo rendering&lt;BR /&gt;
has 3 stages: creating 3D model, converting model to LightWorks format,&lt;BR /&gt;
then rendering. Only the 3rd stage is multithreaded.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75470#M9097</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-07T13:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mac Quad Core</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75471#M9098</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Aaron wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;I know that Windows ArchiCAD isn't optimized for 64 bit computing&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

AC9 Build 2172 will recognize more than 2 GB of Ram (i.e. 4Gb) on Windows boxes running the 64-Bit version of Windows. It requires a 64-bit version of the WIBU driver. The Amyuni Print driver won't run on 64-bit systems - so there's a catch.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

So GS should get rid of Amyuni and find someone else, right? Maybe even Adobe ... or should not Microsoft do that at last, as Apple did, so that PDF - the de facto electronic paper standard - is included in the OS?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Installation-update/Mac-Quad-Core/m-p/75471#M9098</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-09T16:56:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

