<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sea level or reference level? in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185420#M100412</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;In Story Settings, do you use sea level zero and first floor +35765... or do you use first floor at zero and reference level 1 is -35765?&lt;BR /&gt;
Out of curiosity!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mats_Knutsson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-03T09:59:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sea level or reference level?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185420#M100412</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;In Story Settings, do you use sea level zero and first floor +35765... or do you use first floor at zero and reference level 1 is -35765?&lt;BR /&gt;
Out of curiosity!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185420#M100412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mats_Knutsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-03T09:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sea level or reference level?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185421#M100413</link>
      <description>I would always try to use 0.00 for the Ground Floor Level and use Reference Levels for anything else (like -105.00 for Reference Level 1 - in Hungary, we have to give real height values relative to the level of the Baltic Sea).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185421#M100413</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-03T10:29:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sea level or reference level?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185422#M100414</link>
      <description>See also this post by Link:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=125490#125490" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... 490#125490"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=125490#125490&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Sea-level-or-reference-level/m-p/185422#M100414</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-03T18:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

