<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AC int VS AC USA in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188282#M102049</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Short question: what is the difference between Archicad International and Archicad USA?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:17:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-15T18:17:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188282#M102049</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Short question: what is the difference between Archicad International and Archicad USA?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:17:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188282#M102049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-15T18:17:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188283#M102050</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Henry wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Short question: what is the difference between Archicad International and Archicad USA?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
INT &amp;gt; Metric library and enviroment profile.&lt;BR /&gt;
USA &amp;gt; Feets and inches Library and enviroment profile.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188283#M102050</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-15T18:21:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188284#M102051</link>
      <description>Reason I ask is that I can get a used version of AC11 but it is AC USA, I work in metric only - can I change the USA to metric or is it set?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188284#M102051</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-15T18:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188285#M102052</link>
      <description>Of course You can use metric system with US version of AC&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Furthermore the INT version will probably work with the USA key, but check the legal issues when using US version of AC outside US, read carefully the license.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Piotr</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188285#M102052</guid>
      <dc:creator>Piotr Dobrowolski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-15T18:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188286#M102053</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Piotr wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Furthermore the INT version will probably work with the USA key, but check the legal issues when using US version of AC outside US, read carefully the license.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

The INT version will work (well i know the AUS and INT versions both work on a AUS license).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As for the second 'licensing' point - i am not disputing what you are saying (i have not looked) however .... what a pile of crap.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Arbitrary geographical restrictions to prop up certain business models. We all use the same program, written by some guys in Hungary, running on essentially the same hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Its like movie studios and their stupid Region Codes on DVDs, DRM, etc etc. Stop treating your paying customers like idiots or criminals. I have absolutely no hesitation in ripping movies to remove region encoding given the number of countries i have DVDs from. The same applies to software IMO .. if you have legitimately purchased something then you should be entitled to use that wherever you may be.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank god software companies have not managed to 'persuade' hardware manufacturers to incorporate some form of 'Region Code' horror in the computer industry.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
(rant over)   &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188286#M102053</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-16T12:01:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188287#M102054</link>
      <description>All ArchiCAD versions can be downloaded from Bittorrent.&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is the ArchiCADWiki article that has the details:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.archicadwiki.com/ArchiCAD%20Bittorrent%20Downloads" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.archicadwiki.com/ArchiCAD%20 ... 0Downloads"&gt;http://www.archicadwiki.com/ArchiCAD%20Bittorrent%20Downloads&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188287#M102054</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-16T12:29:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188288#M102055</link>
      <description>the only differences I know of between US and INT are:&lt;BR /&gt;
- The metric library comes with INT and the Imperial library with US&lt;BR /&gt;
- The INT numbers its ground floor 0 while the US version numbers it 1.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188288#M102055</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-16T15:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AC int VS AC USA</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188289#M102056</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;- The INT numbers its ground floor 0 while the US version numbers it 1.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

and i seem to remember you cannot actually create a 'Storey 0' .. so you have -1 &amp;amp; 1. Not sure if this would cause any problems with multi-storey elements if people are collaborating using different international versions (a particularly realistic possibility now with AC13).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:19:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/AC-int-VS-AC-USA/m-p/188289#M102056</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-16T15:19:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

