<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fill types in independent details - workflow question in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188353#M102073</link>
    <description>This seems more buglike than featurish. (If I understand you correctly.) I don't see any advantage to it.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-12T14:35:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fill types in independent details - workflow question</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188352#M102072</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;In residential typical wall sections, I noticed that the  default fill for the 2x4 stud wall does not have a "drafting fill" associated with it.  When you manually change an independent detail's cut fill to drafting fill, it defaults over to a 100% fill, whereas the built-in cut and cover fills are set to 0%.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I assume this is a workflow issue.  My question is what workflow uses that feature and when would I want to incorporate it in my work?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Snap&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:43:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188352#M102072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T02:43:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fill types in independent details - workflow question</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188353#M102073</link>
      <description>This seems more buglike than featurish. (If I understand you correctly.) I don't see any advantage to it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188353#M102073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T14:35:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fill types in independent details - workflow question</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188354#M102074</link>
      <description>Well, I &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;was &lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;trying to see it in a positive light.&lt;BR /&gt;
Snap</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Fill-types-in-independent-details-workflow-question/m-p/188354#M102074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T19:20:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

