<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Weird shadow domes in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195725#M106217</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;zoltar wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Matthew&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
that would be one way to go. However applying a fill over the problematic area minimizes the work instead of overlaying an entire view.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

More a question of the desired effect than the amount of work I would say. Overlaying two views is pretty quick, and then the updates are automatic, but it may not be what you want.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-04T15:04:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195718#M106210</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Can anyone please tell me why whenever I construct a dome the shadow is like this? This is a dome made out of a wall with a complex profile, but the same weird shadow occurs in dome roofs as well as the dome library part.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers in advance&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67200i5B784D53AB094336/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="weird shadow.PNG" title="weird shadow.PNG" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195718#M106210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T09:54:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195719#M106211</link>
      <description>you see that wierd shadow cos archicad is NOT able to give accurate view of rounded object cos archicad alys cut down number of polygons and thats why we dont have accurate sections and elevations of rounded object.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
OFC this was wish and ofc it is older wish !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
pic 1 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Dome in MOI3d / this is how this dome supose to look/&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10903iD6416E0152EFD6F4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Capture1.JPG" title="Capture1.JPG" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195719#M106211</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T14:49:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195720#M106212</link>
      <description>archicad dome /inacurate shadow represetation/&lt;BR /&gt;
resolution of dome in archicad is 500</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195720#M106212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T14:52:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195721#M106213</link>
      <description>archicad resolution 35&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10906iADED694B790DA5B2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="archicad1.JPG" title="archicad1.JPG" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:54:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195721#M106213</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T14:54:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195722#M106214</link>
      <description>@ NeckoFromSarajevo&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
so basically is there no way to get a decent looking shadow on a  dome? I have to draw it with raster?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers in advance</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195722#M106214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T20:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195723#M106215</link>
      <description>Assuming you are talking about shadows in elevation, this is constrained by the use of vector graphics (and thus pen colors). If you want smooth bitmap shadows you can shoot a 3D elevation/rendering and overlay it with the vector drawing.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195723#M106215</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T20:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195724#M106216</link>
      <description>Matthew&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
that would be one way to go. However applying a fill over the problematic area minimizes the work instead of overlaying an entire view.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195724#M106216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T14:01:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weird shadow domes</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195725#M106217</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;zoltar wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Matthew&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
that would be one way to go. However applying a fill over the problematic area minimizes the work instead of overlaying an entire view.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

More a question of the desired effect than the amount of work I would say. Overlaying two views is pretty quick, and then the updates are automatic, but it may not be what you want.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Weird-shadow-domes/m-p/195725#M106217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T15:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

