<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224816#M121184</link>
    <description>Making two different materials for different wall types will collapse as soon as two demising walls meet on a T junction (at the opposite end of the demising wall: double wall meets double wall). Modeling a single demising wall out of two Archicad walls will not work in any other Archicad aspect than this one. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am trying with different composites using the same materials and the problem appears only with some, and can't nail down what's triggering it.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:25:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224812#M121180</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Any idea what is causing this problem, how it can be solved? Layers have the same intersection priority, exterior walls have a higher junction order than the demising wall, the 'frame with insulation' material is the same everywhere, and the cleanup is still weird. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
On the first picture, the left exterior wall is selected and highlighted just to make it readable in this picture. I thought the problem was related to the three-reference-line junction (which I really need), but the second picture shows the problem is still there even with a single continuous exterior wall.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The problem still happens regardless of where I put the reference line on both the exterior wall/s and the demising wall —I tried all variations.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Screen Shot 2017-08-28 at 3.12.32 PM.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/12951iB635418C877302E2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2017-08-28 at 3.12.32 PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2017-08-28 at 3.12.32 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 06:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224812#M121180</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T06:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224813#M121181</link>
      <description>i dont get what you are trying to achieve. do you want the line on the left vertical insulation or no line on the right side?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:01:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224813#M121181</guid>
      <dc:creator>insideru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T20:01:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224814#M121182</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;insideru wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;i dont get what you are trying to achieve. do you want the line on the left vertical insulation or no line on the right side?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I was expecting no line. I am trying to achieve consistency. Both consistent line and consistent no line would be defensible.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224814#M121182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T20:45:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224815#M121183</link>
      <description>well, if it were me i would go with a line. thats because the insulation in the vertical wall is clearly another building material (may be the same product but a different width makes it a different material to me &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
but that doesn't make the whole problem go away.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
here are the tests i made:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
1. pretty much your setup, top wall one piece, vertical wall one piece piece&lt;BR /&gt;
2. vertical wall has a different building material for the insulation (with a lower priority), top wall one piece, vertical wall one piece&lt;BR /&gt;
3. same composite as on #2, but on the top there are 2 walls intersecting on the reference line. weird #*$@ happens&lt;BR /&gt;
4. solution one: 2 different vertical walls, each with half of the composite, different building material, line separator&lt;BR /&gt;
5. solution two: same thing, but with the same building material, no lines[/img]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/12849i450C00586F5BAC26/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 01.00.05.png" title="Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 01.00.05.png" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224815#M121183</guid>
      <dc:creator>insideru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:03:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224816#M121184</link>
      <description>Making two different materials for different wall types will collapse as soon as two demising walls meet on a T junction (at the opposite end of the demising wall: double wall meets double wall). Modeling a single demising wall out of two Archicad walls will not work in any other Archicad aspect than this one. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am trying with different composites using the same materials and the problem appears only with some, and can't nail down what's triggering it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224816#M121184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:25:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224817#M121185</link>
      <description>Apparently archicad doesn't like those 2 insulation parts of one wall meeting up with an insulation part of another wall. I needed to fake the composite to get a somewhat clean intersection (its still not 100% clean). Here's how i did it: on the outer wall, between the insulation and the interior finish, just add a thin (2mm or even less) strip of a material with a high priority. Then make sure all the walls have the same junction priority.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is the best i got &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_sad.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224817#M121185</guid>
      <dc:creator>insideru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T23:44:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T-junction composite cleanup weirdness</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224818#M121186</link>
      <description>I think this may be a limitation in the algorithm that calculates these joints.&lt;BR /&gt;
Interestingly, if there is no plaster on the side of the thick wall, it would join with both insulation skins properly.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would probably model the vertical single composite Wall using 2 composite wall instances, that would work.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:58:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/T-junction-composite-cleanup-weirdness/m-p/224818#M121186</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-29T16:58:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

