<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Marking Simple Slab as Finish in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233432#M124990</link>
    <description>I see your point about consistency - with all having those options.  But, I don't think it is really so much work to create a new composite for a single skin.  A few more clicks for sure.  An important advantage of composites, vs simple slabs, walls etc, is that it provides a level of abstraction or indirection.  With a meaningfully named composite, if something arises and you wish to change the construction of that slab (and any others using it) - you just redefine the composite.  Done.  Globally with one step.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 18:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-27T18:12:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Marking Simple Slab as Finish</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233429#M124987</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;heya - I'm wondering if there is a way to set a simple slab (as in, non composite) as a finish. I can't model the slab as a composite slab because the structural part of the slab is vaulted. If not, I think this would be very useful addition especially when dealing with renovation filters (which I am in this project &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; ). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IMG src="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/mh0qlcu9yk4uki1/Screen%20Shot%202020-12-26%20at%2020.46.54.png?dl=0" /&gt;&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 15:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233429#M124987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emre Senoglu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T15:32:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Marking Simple Slab as Finish</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233430#M124988</link>
      <description>Nothing special is needed here... just create a 1-skin composite for your finish slab and mark the skin as a 'finish'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The result is a 'simple' slab that is a 'finish' and will disappear when finishes are not shown.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think it is best that these tag options for 'finish', 'core', 'other' remain associated with composites and that the basic (non-composite) slab be left as simple as possible for a simpler learning progression.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 23:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233430#M124988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-26T23:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Marking Simple Slab as Finish</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233431#M124989</link>
      <description>Hey Karl, thanks - that is indeed one workaround. Bit annoying that i have to create single layer composites for multiple walls/floors though don't you think? Having core/finish tags in complex profiles is very useful, and I don't see why not this system should involve more items, say simple slabs and perhaps even certain (or all) library parts: think of gutters, wall extras, etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233431#M124989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emre Senoglu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-27T08:06:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Marking Simple Slab as Finish</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233432#M124990</link>
      <description>I see your point about consistency - with all having those options.  But, I don't think it is really so much work to create a new composite for a single skin.  A few more clicks for sure.  An important advantage of composites, vs simple slabs, walls etc, is that it provides a level of abstraction or indirection.  With a meaningfully named composite, if something arises and you wish to change the construction of that slab (and any others using it) - you just redefine the composite.  Done.  Globally with one step.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 18:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Marking-Simple-Slab-as-Finish/m-p/233432#M124990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-27T18:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

