<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Composite Skins - A cautionary tale in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242016#M128837</link>
    <description>I find that thin skins in composites work quite well and show up better in detailing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I also use the ability to change the linetype and colour that separates skins.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the example attached there is a membrane skin and also a vent indicated using two fills adjoining separated by an arrow linetype.[img][/img]</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tim Ball</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-20T19:07:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Composite Skins - A cautionary tale</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242014#M128835</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Following discussions with GS UK it would appear that although you can insert a skin with zero thickness in a composite wall the consequences in AC21 can be unexpected. I added one as a vapour membrane which needed to appear in the skin list label but technically had minimal thickness so a value of zero made sense.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In my case I was getting core dimensions changing to non core locations when adding or removing other skins, the section display was missing fills and in 3D part of the wall was missing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have suggested that GS need to fix this so that you can't enter a zero value but in the mean time always check a skin has a thickness!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 06:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242014#M128835</guid>
      <dc:creator>DGSketcher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T06:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Composite Skins - A cautionary tale</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242015#M128836</link>
      <description>I also find that 0 thickness composite skins would be very useful. it would be much appreciated if it would become possible in the future.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 10:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242015#M128836</guid>
      <dc:creator>Titiriga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-19T10:38:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Composite Skins - A cautionary tale</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242016#M128837</link>
      <description>I find that thin skins in composites work quite well and show up better in detailing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I also use the ability to change the linetype and colour that separates skins.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the example attached there is a membrane skin and also a vent indicated using two fills adjoining separated by an arrow linetype.[img][/img]</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Composite-Skins-A-cautionary-tale/m-p/242016#M128837</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-20T19:07:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

