<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Stairmaker &amp;quot;Lower Offset of the Landing&amp;quot; in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244893#M130088</link>
    <description>Same here. Stairs with no offset on landings are most common in my work.&lt;BR /&gt;
If i have to pick worst thing in Archicad from v 6.5 that is definetly stairmaker.&lt;BR /&gt;
Why I can't make stairs like this? Or can I?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-18T10:58:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stairmaker "Lower Offset of the Landing"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244892#M130087</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Every now and then I need to remind myself why I don't use the AC default stair tool. If I recall correctly, each time it is because Stairmaker will not allow 0 in the "Lower Offset of the Landing" box.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Not sure if there is a good reason for GS to not allow this but I almost always want this to be at 0.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Am I missing something. I don't want to model each flight and landings separately.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 15:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244892#M130087</guid>
      <dc:creator>jakubc7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T15:33:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stairmaker "Lower Offset of the Landing"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244893#M130088</link>
      <description>Same here. Stairs with no offset on landings are most common in my work.&lt;BR /&gt;
If i have to pick worst thing in Archicad from v 6.5 that is definetly stairmaker.&lt;BR /&gt;
Why I can't make stairs like this? Or can I?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244893#M130088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-18T10:58:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stairmaker "Lower Offset of the Landing"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244894#M130089</link>
      <description>Can't you guys just a set a very small value that is just a bit more than zero?&lt;BR /&gt;
For example, if the tread depth is 300 mm, then set a value of 0.1 mm. It will not really show in the plan and in dimensions but StairMaker will allow it since it is a non-zero value.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Stairmaker-quot-Lower-Offset-of-the-Landing-quot/m-p/244894#M130089</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-18T12:47:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

