<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: an unnatural display by &amp;quot;priority connection method&amp;quot; in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248853#M131637</link>
    <description>@Laszlo&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes the little bit higher is an error which is just rectified.&lt;BR /&gt;
Seems "reference line method" is more natural, and personally I prefer opt to this.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-06T15:26:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>an unnatural display by "priority connection method"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248848#M131632</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;
I made two beams with same material (same priority) joint together, the reference line touch each other which is natural, but a very thin part extend which seems not natural. &lt;BR /&gt;
Please advice how to opt not to use "priority based connection"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 10:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248848#M131632</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T10:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: an unatural disply by "priority connection method"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248849#M131633</link>
      <description>Could you also upload a screenshot that is not wireframe? I would like to see the bodies of the joining Beams.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also, what is the Intersection Priority of the two Beams? I see this Beam has it set to '10'. What is its value for the Beam this Beam joins into?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:29:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248849#M131633</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-05T14:29:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: an unatural disply by "priority connection method"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248850#M131634</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;LaszloNagy wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
Also, what is the Intersection Priority of the two Beams? I see this Beam has it set to '10'. What is its value for the Beam this Beam joins into?
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I choose that  intersection priority by random and just tried, because the 2 beam has the same wood material, and  I don''t quite comprehend intersection priority which has thousands of sequence.... too complicated but I don't know the significance is</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 20:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248850#M131634</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-05T20:40:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: an unnatural display by "priority connection method"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248851#M131635</link>
      <description>Hello Laszlo,&lt;BR /&gt;
This is the non-framing view,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 03:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248851#M131635</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-06T03:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: an unnatural display by "priority connection method"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248852#M131636</link>
      <description>So it looks like Archicad does do it correctly since the connecting Beam's top is indeed a bit higher than the other Beam's top. And what happens in such situations is that the connecting Beam is automatically extended to the farther side of the other Beam. I think this behavior is hard-coded into Archicad.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You can select the connecting Beam, and trim it by clicking the closer edge of the other Beam. Then remove the Beam segment above the other Beam.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 12:34:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248852#M131636</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-06T12:34:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: an unnatural display by "priority connection method"</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248853#M131637</link>
      <description>@Laszlo&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes the little bit higher is an error which is just rectified.&lt;BR /&gt;
Seems "reference line method" is more natural, and personally I prefer opt to this.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/an-unnatural-display-by-quot-priority-connection-method-quot/m-p/248853#M131637</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-06T15:26:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

