<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issue with a morphed slab in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250200#M132222</link>
    <description>Yes that is annoying but still worth a try to double the segments. The more segments you get the less the difference between the straight and curved facet. I like your suggestion Barry, that could work just fine.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carstenem</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-09T02:31:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250196#M132218</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi have an element made from a slab - rectangle with a half round end. If I convert to morph and apply a radius edge the curve is slightly different to the straight line (leaving a small raised junction) - In the section  you can see the different  radius of the curve in the background and in the 3 d a change in the reflection.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have actually printed this in 3d and the bump is real.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any thoughts on how to generate this correctly.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 17:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250196#M132218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T17:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250197#M132219</link>
      <description>Morphs are prone to faceting which is where the bump may have come from.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would look at at forming this with a slab and adding a perimeter wall with a custom profile containing the curved edge. Not sure how that works with 3D printing but in modelling terms you may get a more accurate representation.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250197#M132219</guid>
      <dc:creator>DGSketcher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-08T08:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250198#M132220</link>
      <description>Try to double segment the morph a couple of times. Do it twice first and see if that helps. Morph needs to be selected.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 01:51:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250198#M132220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carstenem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T01:51:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250199#M132221</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Carstenem wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
Try to double segment the morph a couple of times. Do it twice first and see if that helps. Morph needs to be selected.
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not sure this will help as it seems that the chamfer facet size on the straight edge is different to the one on the curved edge.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;



&lt;BR /&gt;
The only thing I can think of is to create a flat morph polygon that is the shape of the chamfer you want. and then tube it around the slab.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;



&lt;BR /&gt;
Barry.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250199#M132221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T02:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250200#M132222</link>
      <description>Yes that is annoying but still worth a try to double the segments. The more segments you get the less the difference between the straight and curved facet. I like your suggestion Barry, that could work just fine.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250200#M132222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carstenem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T02:31:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250201#M132223</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Barry wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
The only thing I can think of is to create a flat morph polygon that is the shape of the chamfer you want. and then tube it around the slab.&lt;BR /&gt;
Barry.
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Barry&lt;BR /&gt;
After pondering it for a while that was my thought too.&lt;BR /&gt;
Tube is a bit of a pain as the profile has to be coded in segments although I fairly sure the XY plane curve can use the additional status codes.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't suppose you still have the GDL for the tube you setup?&lt;BR /&gt;
cheers John&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers John</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250201#M132223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-12T03:53:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250202#M132224</link>
      <description>That wasn't GDL that I did.&lt;BR /&gt;
Just a slab with a curved end.&lt;BR /&gt;
Add a polygon morph to one end and then use pet palette tube option to extrude it around the slab.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I was scripting this then i would probably just use FPRISM or HPRISM.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Barry.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250202#M132224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-12T04:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with a morphed slab</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250203#M132225</link>
      <description>Hello All,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I looked at it and it definitely looks like a bug, I added it to our list (#254344). Interestingly enough, when you select a single straight edge on a morph and fillet it, then it works file, but if you have multiple edges selected, then the curve won't be tangential to the faces.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think what Barry did, is just create the curve manually from a flat morph, and then use the tube method from the pet palette to extrude it. I also tried that, and it works like a charm. I think this is the best workaround until a fix.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Issue-with-a-morphed-slab/m-p/250203#M132225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Kovacs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T12:09:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

