<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic why? the archicad is not more flexible like revit to make complex geometries? in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253951#M133786</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;my question is why archicad can not easily make complex geometries like revit mass tools or get more free plugins to the market like revit&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-19T22:14:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why? the archicad is not more flexible like revit to make complex geometries?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253951#M133786</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;my question is why archicad can not easily make complex geometries like revit mass tools or get more free plugins to the market like revit&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253951#M133786</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T22:14:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why? the archicad is not more flexible like revit to make complex geometries?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253952#M133787</link>
      <description>For when regular tools for complex geometries are not enough you have the Rhino/Grasshopper.&lt;BR /&gt;
Check &lt;A href="http://www.weareenzyme.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.weareenzyme.com&lt;/A&gt; for some examples besides ARCHICAD's you tube channel and the series "modeled in AC in particular".&lt;BR /&gt;
There are multiple options to do massing with the existing AC tools so I don't see a particular problem with that one. The workflow is different but it can be done&lt;BR /&gt;
As for free plugins I don't know that many people that like working without compensation but most of the times it depends on what you need. Without knowing specific samples it is hard to know what functionality is missing that will be fixed by "free" plugins.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253952#M133787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-20T15:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why? the archicad is not more flexible like revit to make complex geometries?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253953#M133788</link>
      <description>With free plugins you usually get exactly what you paid for.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don’t know of any professional person or organisation that would give away their effort and intellectual property for free. ArchiCAD and Revit are professional software not enthusiast software so there is not generally a community of enthusiasts working for free to develop free plugins</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2018 07:04:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253953#M133788</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-21T07:04:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why? the archicad is not more flexible like revit to make complex geometries?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253954#M133789</link>
      <description>I'd like to think the morph tool covers all your needs. Maybe you need to learn how to use it &lt;E&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:20:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253954#M133789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Earthworm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-22T07:20:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why? the archicad is not more flexible like revit to make complex geometries?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253955#M133790</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;paxis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
my question is why archicad can not easily make complex geometries like revit mass tools or get more free plugins to the market like revit
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Check out my latest ARCHICAD Speed Modeling Tutorial , then look through some of the others I produced and you will see plenty of complex buildings.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ARCHICAD covers 90% of your modeling needs, when you do "hit the wall " then as mentioned Grasshopper and Rhino is an option.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IFRAME width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/suA6sZxLdDg" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""&gt;&lt;/IFRAME&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 21:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/why-the-archicad-is-not-more-flexible-like-revit-to-make-complex/m-p/253955#M133790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carstenem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-01T21:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

