<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wall Sections in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259315#M136074</link>
    <description>Karl,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks. This method has some possibilities.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-06T14:21:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259311#M136070</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Can anyone tell me if I am doing wall sections right in Archicad? The wall on the right is a composite wall section straight from the Archicad section tool. This section is adequate for a small scale of 1/8" or 1/4" building section.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But a larger scale wall section requires more details showing CMU coursing (see wall section on the left). To to get that I put the fills shown in the middle right on the top of the wall on the right, essentially doing some drafting.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of course one can create a complex profile using the same fills, but it does not look right in plan. So is there a better way to do wall sections showing the CMU coursing without much drafting on the top of it? Thanks.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Wall Sections.JPG" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/11260i7EE496776E73B76D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Wall Sections.JPG" alt="Wall Sections.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 06:34:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259311#M136070</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T06:34:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259312#M136071</link>
      <description>While you could easily get different fills in plan and section using Graphic Overrides, I think the accuracy of the coursing would be an issue in sections so you are probably stuck with a drafting approach. You might also look at &lt;A href="http://thebimstore.com/bim-products/gdl-objects/cavity-wall-section.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://thebimstore.com/bim-products/gdl ... ction.html"&gt;http://thebimstore.com/bim-products/gdl-objects/cavity-wall-section.html&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt; for a parametric object. They also have a simpler version.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2017 21:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259312#M136071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Morrison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-04T21:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259313#M136072</link>
      <description>Richard, thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 16:37:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259313#M136072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-05T16:37:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259314#M136073</link>
      <description>You could also set up the complex profile such that each course is its own fill, there by establishing the coursing just as you want it.  Doesn't look exactly like a 2d detail, but the fills could be refined for the building materials.  Just another option.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259314#M136073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Griffith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-06T12:16:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259315#M136074</link>
      <description>Karl,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks. This method has some possibilities.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259315#M136074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-06T14:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259316#M136075</link>
      <description>.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 04:13:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259316#M136075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Jepson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-26T04:13:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Sections</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259317#M136076</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Cheikh wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;...Of course one can create a complex profile using the same fills, but it does not look right in plan....&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

You can get the Plan View to look correct using a Complex Profile.&lt;BR /&gt;
You may just need to adjust the Cut Plane to a better place and set the Floor Plan Display to Cut Only.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 04:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Sections/m-p/259317#M136076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Jepson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-26T04:24:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

