<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Classic design in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276330#M143463</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;CER1980 wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;real engineer can design eith Archicad&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

These wouldnt be acepted as engineering drawing in Australia&lt;BR /&gt;
Our engineering drawing require 2D/3D details, structural components, Energy,simulations, optimization, data,etc,etc&lt;BR /&gt;
Tho I do like your basic sketch presentation but IMO it lacks real data that client can understand&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is a std detail..it is the 20% that cant be done in AC that is of major concern!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://plus.google.com/u/1/114544938995916531570/posts/WXhps9MjJTy?pid=6163410525265532674&amp;amp;oid=114544938995916531570" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="https://plus.google.com/u/1/11454493899 ... 5916531570"&gt;https://plus.google.com/u/1/114544938995916531570/posts/WXhps9MjJTy?pid=6163410525265532674&amp;amp;oid=114544938995916531570&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is an recent interesting Article&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://sourceable.net/is-bim-overhyped/" target="_blank"&gt;https://sourceable.net/is-bim-overhyped/&lt;/A&gt;#</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 00:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-13T00:17:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Classic design</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276329#M143462</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;real engineer can design eith Archicad&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71520iE9CFADCBC80CB2DE/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="1394-3-22.jpg" title="1394-3-22.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 19:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276329#M143462</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-12T19:33:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classic design</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276330#M143463</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;CER1980 wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;real engineer can design eith Archicad&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

These wouldnt be acepted as engineering drawing in Australia&lt;BR /&gt;
Our engineering drawing require 2D/3D details, structural components, Energy,simulations, optimization, data,etc,etc&lt;BR /&gt;
Tho I do like your basic sketch presentation but IMO it lacks real data that client can understand&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is a std detail..it is the 20% that cant be done in AC that is of major concern!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://plus.google.com/u/1/114544938995916531570/posts/WXhps9MjJTy?pid=6163410525265532674&amp;amp;oid=114544938995916531570" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="https://plus.google.com/u/1/11454493899 ... 5916531570"&gt;https://plus.google.com/u/1/114544938995916531570/posts/WXhps9MjJTy?pid=6163410525265532674&amp;amp;oid=114544938995916531570&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is an recent interesting Article&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://sourceable.net/is-bim-overhyped/" target="_blank"&gt;https://sourceable.net/is-bim-overhyped/&lt;/A&gt;#</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 00:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276330#M143463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-13T00:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classic design</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276331#M143464</link>
      <description>Helloo-in Archicad you have and detail in 2d&amp;amp;3d</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:04:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276331#M143464</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-20T14:04:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Classic design</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276332#M143465</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;CER1980 wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Helloo-in Archicad you have and detail in 2d&amp;amp;3d&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
I think you are missing my previous point..clients are no longer interested in just 2D &amp;amp; 3D Archicad models without  Data, Simulations &amp;amp; Parametrics &lt;BR /&gt;
(Data-sim-etrics).&lt;BR /&gt;
I also have the details in Vws, Revit, Multiphysics, Maplesim &amp;amp; Matlab.. and use (2D-&amp;gt;7D?) whatever it takes to put the deal  on the table.... HTH&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://plus.google.com/u/1/114544938995916531570/posts/WXhps9MjJTy?pid=6163411314599175474&amp;amp;oid=114544938995916531570" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="https://plus.google.com/u/1/11454493899 ... 5916531570"&gt;https://plus.google.com/u/1/114544938995916531570/posts/WXhps9MjJTy?pid=6163411314599175474&amp;amp;oid=114544938995916531570&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2015 01:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Classic-design/m-p/276332#M143465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-21T01:14:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

