<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Curved Stair issue with construction. in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283946#M146683</link>
    <description>That is rather complex problem, I belive it is dificult to program archicad to generate correct geometry in every scenario. In situations as this I would use another tool (perhaps mesh or morph) to create the bottom part of the stairs and only show risers from archicad stair tool in sections and 2D. Also it is rather unfortunte &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  that you cannot use stair in boolean operation - if you could, you would be able to easily shedule mass of the stairs.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jan Vlach</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-11T18:05:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Curved Stair issue with construction.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283945#M146682</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;&lt;A href="https://gyazo.com/b9010f4eb7a7a984371970579cf8ce52" target="_blank"&gt;https://gyazo.com/b9010f4eb7a7a984371970579cf8ce52&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This was an issue with previous stair tool and still is on current new one. Why curved stair construction(ceiling) looks so ugly from the bottom? It should be clean and smooth curve and is really tough task to make it look good on section view.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 14:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283945#M146682</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T14:40:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Curved Stair issue with construction.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283946#M146683</link>
      <description>That is rather complex problem, I belive it is dificult to program archicad to generate correct geometry in every scenario. In situations as this I would use another tool (perhaps mesh or morph) to create the bottom part of the stairs and only show risers from archicad stair tool in sections and 2D. Also it is rather unfortunte &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  that you cannot use stair in boolean operation - if you could, you would be able to easily shedule mass of the stairs.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283946#M146683</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan Vlach</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T18:05:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Curved Stair issue with construction.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283947#M146684</link>
      <description>Yeah, I managed to make it look acceptable using lines and fills. It's not perfect though.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283947#M146684</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T19:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Curved Stair issue with construction.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283948#M146685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The underside is much better with flat landings.&lt;BR /&gt;It is the winder treads that really messes things up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can split the structure of the stair - it will remain as one complete stair.&lt;BR /&gt;This will give you slightly better control of the underside of the stair - especially on the landings and winders.&lt;BR /&gt;But you still won't get a great underside.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The best solution is to model the stair in separate sections for each flight, landing and winder.&lt;BR /&gt;So model one stair that is full height - just to get the settings for risers and goings and number of treads.&lt;BR /&gt;Using these settings, model the individual parts of the stair and elevate each section to the correct height.&lt;BR /&gt;You can set the end connections so all the pieces join correctly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The down side of this is it is not one complete stair, and you will have to adjust tread numbers, walking line, break line etc., for each part.&lt;BR /&gt;It is possible - it just takes longer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BarryKelly_0-1653461495450.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21843iA4862AE9D926EB25/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BarryKelly_0-1653461495450.jpeg" alt="BarryKelly_0-1653461495450.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 06:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Curved-Stair-issue-with-construction/m-p/283948#M146685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-25T06:51:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

