<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3D view verus 2D in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/3D-view-verus-2D/m-p/293593#M151466</link>
    <description>Topic moved - please don't just post in 'Archicad+'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The plan view is a symbolic representation and it is relatively easy to control the lines and fills to make it look like the wall skins are wrapping into reveals.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The 3D is harder to control as it would need to manipulate the actual wall skins on all sides of the window - not just what it should look like as it does in plan.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The section should be showing the same as you see in 3D as it is actually a 3D view and not a symbolic representation like the plan so I am surprised if you are seeing reveal returns there.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There are a few other post here somewhere discussing this and probably even a wish in the wishes section if you want to look for it and vote (if it has a poll).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Barry.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-28T01:20:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3D view verus 2D</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/3D-view-verus-2D/m-p/293592#M151465</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Why is it and can i resolve the discrepancy shown in the attached images ?   &lt;BR /&gt;
A façade reveal that in plan and section, shows clearly the return inside the window.&lt;BR /&gt;
however in 3d, its simply ignored ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
SW&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 12:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/3D-view-verus-2D/m-p/293592#M151465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T12:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3D view verus 2D</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/3D-view-verus-2D/m-p/293593#M151466</link>
      <description>Topic moved - please don't just post in 'Archicad+'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The plan view is a symbolic representation and it is relatively easy to control the lines and fills to make it look like the wall skins are wrapping into reveals.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The 3D is harder to control as it would need to manipulate the actual wall skins on all sides of the window - not just what it should look like as it does in plan.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The section should be showing the same as you see in 3D as it is actually a 3D view and not a symbolic representation like the plan so I am surprised if you are seeing reveal returns there.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There are a few other post here somewhere discussing this and probably even a wish in the wishes section if you want to look for it and vote (if it has a poll).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Barry.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/3D-view-verus-2D/m-p/293593#M151466</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-28T01:20:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

