<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Different wall base elevation: elevated modules, and wall tops anchored to story above in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Different-wall-base-elevation-elevated-modules-and-wall-tops/m-p/296372#M152912</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I have a situation where otherwise identical unit plans have a 1.5" deep subfloor/leveling layer in the upper stories and no subfloor in ground story. So for walls (which start at sheathing/slab, that is at bottom of subfloor) in modules I thought I could work this out by &lt;BR /&gt;
- anchoring opening sill heights to story&lt;BR /&gt;
- elevating the walls modules by 1.5" at ground story (so far, it works, wall bases and opening sills are where they need to be)&lt;BR /&gt;
- having wall tops anchored to story above, by which I thought walls in modules would shrink by 1.5" to keep the same distance to story above they have on source file (this didn't work: wall top appears 1.5" higher than I thought they would, which is what does happen with the same walls modeled locally with wall base at different story offsets).&lt;BR /&gt;
Hotlinked Module Settings are set to 'Adjust to host project story structure — Top Linked elements will stretch'.  &lt;BR /&gt;
So basically I think I am screwed. Solid element operations for cutting off the bottom 1.5" of walls are not an option in this case. I think material priorities will not help because walls at bottom floor don't connect with slab (I could perhaps try to fake a 1.5" topping slab with a higher priority material, with reference plane matching base of wall which needs to be trimmed, and this slab would merge on sections&amp;amp;model with the other half-slab below). If anybody can think of a better approach please let me know.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Edit: the fake topping half-slab with reference plane at base of wall does work for 3D and sections. Not for schedules and find-select for 'actual' wall height, but you can't always etc. Still, modeling it clean would be nicer.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 06:21:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-24T06:21:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different wall base elevation: elevated modules, and wall tops anchored to story above</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Different-wall-base-elevation-elevated-modules-and-wall-tops/m-p/296372#M152912</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I have a situation where otherwise identical unit plans have a 1.5" deep subfloor/leveling layer in the upper stories and no subfloor in ground story. So for walls (which start at sheathing/slab, that is at bottom of subfloor) in modules I thought I could work this out by &lt;BR /&gt;
- anchoring opening sill heights to story&lt;BR /&gt;
- elevating the walls modules by 1.5" at ground story (so far, it works, wall bases and opening sills are where they need to be)&lt;BR /&gt;
- having wall tops anchored to story above, by which I thought walls in modules would shrink by 1.5" to keep the same distance to story above they have on source file (this didn't work: wall top appears 1.5" higher than I thought they would, which is what does happen with the same walls modeled locally with wall base at different story offsets).&lt;BR /&gt;
Hotlinked Module Settings are set to 'Adjust to host project story structure — Top Linked elements will stretch'.  &lt;BR /&gt;
So basically I think I am screwed. Solid element operations for cutting off the bottom 1.5" of walls are not an option in this case. I think material priorities will not help because walls at bottom floor don't connect with slab (I could perhaps try to fake a 1.5" topping slab with a higher priority material, with reference plane matching base of wall which needs to be trimmed, and this slab would merge on sections&amp;amp;model with the other half-slab below). If anybody can think of a better approach please let me know.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Edit: the fake topping half-slab with reference plane at base of wall does work for 3D and sections. Not for schedules and find-select for 'actual' wall height, but you can't always etc. Still, modeling it clean would be nicer.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 06:21:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Different-wall-base-elevation-elevated-modules-and-wall-tops/m-p/296372#M152912</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T06:21:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

