<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic BEST PRACTICE: Loading Surface Presets per library in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/BEST-PRACTICE-Loading-Surface-Presets-per-library/m-p/605734#M172067</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Previously, going way back, I created a colour system whereby the colour consultant would fill out a form (in MSAccess) and it would then interpret and write out a specific GDL file (into the job folder)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Upon load of the project and assigning that particular 'Colour' folder, the newly chosen colours would be redefined and appear on the model which uses abstract naming rather than a colour&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;eg Wall Finish - Primary&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and so on using the colour design principles of 60/30/10&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Aurasphere_0-1717023285073.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61451i78D333EDA2693CD7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Aurasphere_0-1717023285073.png" alt="Aurasphere_0-1717023285073.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This meant colour consult responsible for choices &amp;gt; BIM tech opens model + folder addition &amp;gt; Renders image using template direct onto layout.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A long time has passed and I left, management changed the system back to colours per object and turned it back into a mammoth task for uses (vs loading a folder). They also destroyed the normalised structured data and ported to 'Framework' (spending years +consultant) and with no way to easily extract formatted data back into GDL etc...well some peeps, as lovely as they are...have no idea, I returned to work there and was booted out because I wasnt just trying to re implement but also fix all the crap that had leaked in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BUT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With a chance to do it all fresh; is there now a way to simply create colour 'options'? I know its not geometry and I realise I could change the scheme, save the attributes out per preset and import/overwrite&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When previously loading GDL, it would nicely just overwrite. Im developing for myself atm so the idea would be to assign as before, create an output and store variations in a folder, then just load them in eg like a master gdl object etc&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Windows &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 14:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Aurasphere</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-06T14:29:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BEST PRACTICE: Loading Surface Presets per library</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/BEST-PRACTICE-Loading-Surface-Presets-per-library/m-p/605734#M172067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Previously, going way back, I created a colour system whereby the colour consultant would fill out a form (in MSAccess) and it would then interpret and write out a specific GDL file (into the job folder)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Upon load of the project and assigning that particular 'Colour' folder, the newly chosen colours would be redefined and appear on the model which uses abstract naming rather than a colour&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;eg Wall Finish - Primary&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and so on using the colour design principles of 60/30/10&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Aurasphere_0-1717023285073.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61451i78D333EDA2693CD7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Aurasphere_0-1717023285073.png" alt="Aurasphere_0-1717023285073.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This meant colour consult responsible for choices &amp;gt; BIM tech opens model + folder addition &amp;gt; Renders image using template direct onto layout.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A long time has passed and I left, management changed the system back to colours per object and turned it back into a mammoth task for uses (vs loading a folder). They also destroyed the normalised structured data and ported to 'Framework' (spending years +consultant) and with no way to easily extract formatted data back into GDL etc...well some peeps, as lovely as they are...have no idea, I returned to work there and was booted out because I wasnt just trying to re implement but also fix all the crap that had leaked in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BUT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With a chance to do it all fresh; is there now a way to simply create colour 'options'? I know its not geometry and I realise I could change the scheme, save the attributes out per preset and import/overwrite&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When previously loading GDL, it would nicely just overwrite. Im developing for myself atm so the idea would be to assign as before, create an output and store variations in a folder, then just load them in eg like a master gdl object etc&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Windows &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 14:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/BEST-PRACTICE-Loading-Surface-Presets-per-library/m-p/605734#M172067</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aurasphere</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-06T14:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BEST PRACTICE: Loading Surface Presets per library</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/BEST-PRACTICE-Loading-Surface-Presets-per-library/m-p/606051#M172115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hmmm...no takers?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Programmatic material assignments must not be particularly important I guess&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or should this be assigned to a diff are...GDL?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Its more about NOT using GDL though&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 20:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/BEST-PRACTICE-Loading-Surface-Presets-per-library/m-p/606051#M172115</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aurasphere</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-01T20:21:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

