<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218410#M174486</link>
    <description>The issue with using an array in the parameters to define the profile is that the selection can only be done by &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; rather than by drop down and since you cannot view the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index numbers&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; anywhere other than the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Attribute Manager&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;, this is not a viable option. If we were able to use requests in the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Parameter Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; this could have worked as then you could have a second and third dummie parameter with one being a standard profile selection, and the other displaying the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index number&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; of the selected profile, but alas, this is not the case...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you can modify parameter arrays via the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;UI Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; this might be possible, as requests work there. The extra work here may as well be used to duplicate standard profile parameters with additional &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;HIDEPARAMETER&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; statements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 03:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-21T03:00:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218399#M174475</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone know how to get multiple complex profiles to work within a single object? So far when I try to add a second profile, changing the relevant request definitions, the first profile breaks...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ling.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 13:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218399#M174475</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-02T13:55:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218400#M174476</link>
      <description>Hi there,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I will post the answer in GDL-forum.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you're talking about saving your profiles in GDL, the best way I have found and based on the image you have posted is to save their vertices coordinates in the Master Script is by using arrays and parameter buffer, in that case you will only have to be careful but the differences between using "&lt;B&gt;use&lt;/B&gt;" and "&lt;B&gt;get&lt;/B&gt;".&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;E&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:59:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218400#M174476</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nader Belal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-13T10:59:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218401#M174477</link>
      <description>I figured out how to do it last week but looks like I forgot to update here. I believe that my issue was all of the variables that needed to be modified resulting in missing or conflicting variables.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;!!! Pull Complex Profile !!!

COMPTYPE_CORE = 0
COMPTYPE_FINISH = 1
COMPTYPE_OTHER = 2


if GLOB_SCRIPT_TYPE = 2 or GLOB_SCRIPT_TYPE = 3 or GLOB_SCRIPT_TYPE = 5 then
	_nComponents = 0
	dim _componentTypes[]

	n = REQUEST{2} ("Profile_components", myProfileIdx, _nComponents, _componentTypes)

	n2 = REQUEST ("Profile_default_boundingbox",  myProfileIdx, _xMin, _yMin, _xMax, _yMax)

	n3 = REQUEST{4} ("Profile_component_info", myProfileIdx, _nComponents, "gs_profile_surface", bMat_profile)

	If rafPro = "Complex" then
			ProWidth = abs(_xMax - _xMin)
			ProHeight = abs(_yMax - _yMin)
			SquareV2 = ProHeight / ( cos(phi) )
	endIf

	if n then
		dim _bShowPart[]
		_needRequestDetails = 0
	
		for _i = 1 to _nComponents
			_bShowPart[_i] = 1    
			  if GLOB_STRUCTURE_DISPLAY = 1 AND _componentTypes[_i] &amp;lt;&amp;gt; COMPTYPE_CORE then _bShowPart[_i] = 0   ! GLOB_STRUCTURE_DISPLAY: 0 – entire structure, 1 – core only, 2 – without finishes
			  if GLOB_STRUCTURE_DISPLAY = 2 AND _componentTypes[_i] = COMPTYPE_FINISH then _bShowPart[_i] = 0
			  if _bShowPart[_i] then _needRequestDetails = 1
		next _i
	
		if _needRequestDetails then
			dim _profileGeometryRawData[]
			n = REQUEST ("Profile_default_geometry", myProfileIdx, _profileGeometryRawData)		! n1, n2, ..., nn, x11, y11,s11 
	
			dim _contStartPoints[]
			dim _contEndPoints[]
			_contStartPoints[1] = _nComponents + 1
			for _i = 2 to _nComponents
				_contStartPoints[_i] = _contStartPoints[_i - 1] + _profileGeometryRawData[_i - 1] * 5
				_contEndPoints[_i-1] = _contStartPoints[_i] - 1
			next _i
			_contEndPoints[_nComponents] = vardim1(_profileGeometryRawData)
		endif
	endif
endif



!!! Pull Complex Profile 2 !!!

if GLOB_SCRIPT_TYPE = 2 or GLOB_SCRIPT_TYPE = 3 or GLOB_SCRIPT_TYPE = 5 then
	_nComponents2 = 0
	dim _componentTypes2[]

	n = REQUEST{2} ("Profile_components", myProfileIdx2, _nComponents2, _componentTypes2)

	n2 = REQUEST ("Profile_default_boundingbox",  myProfileIdx2, _xMin2, _yMin2, _xMax2, _yMax2)

	if n then
		dim _bShowPart2[]
		_needRequestDetails = 0
	
		for _i2 = 1 to _nComponents2
			_bShowPart2[_i2] = 1    
			  if GLOB_STRUCTURE_DISPLAY = 1 AND _componentTypes2[_i2] &amp;lt;&amp;gt; COMPTYPE_CORE then _bShowPart2[_i2] = 0   ! GLOB_STRUCTURE_DISPLAY: 0 – entire structure, 1 – core only, 2 – without finishes
			  if GLOB_STRUCTURE_DISPLAY = 2 AND _componentTypes2[_i2] = COMPTYPE_FINISH then _bShowPart2[_i2] = 0
			  if _bShowPart2[_i2] then _needRequestDetails = 1
		next _i2
	
		if _needRequestDetails then
			dim _profileGeometryRawData2[]
			n = REQUEST ("Profile_default_geometry", myProfileIdx2, _profileGeometryRawData2)		! n1, n2, ..., nn, x11, y11,s11 
	
			dim _contStartPoints2[]
			dim _contEndPoints2[]
			_contStartPoints2[1] = _nComponents2 + 1
			for _i2 = 2 to _nComponents2
				_contStartPoints2[_i2] = _contStartPoints2[_i2 - 1] + _profileGeometryRawData2[_i2 - 1] * 5
				_contEndPoints2[_i2-1] = _contStartPoints2[_i2] - 1
			next _i2
			_contEndPoints2[_nComponents2] = vardim1(_profileGeometryRawData2)
		endif
	endif
endif&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
Saving some profiles in GDL would be a good next step, but a bit extra at the moment.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 01:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218401#M174477</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T01:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218402#M174478</link>
      <description>I see that you didn't specify that you need to extract complex profile geometries when you asked the question</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 16:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218402#M174478</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nader Belal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-15T16:57:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218403#M174479</link>
      <description>Assumption based on my image of two extruded profiles, one of which had failed to generate properly...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218403#M174479</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T01:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218404#M174480</link>
      <description>Why not drawing all the forms into one single profile?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218404#M174480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hmooslechner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T12:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218405#M174481</link>
      <description>@Hmooslechner,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Future maintenance and change by the manufacturer.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:53:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218405#M174481</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nader Belal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T14:53:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218406#M174482</link>
      <description>Flexibility of use. Object in image was scripted with duplication and offset for simplicity of testing.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218406#M174482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-18T01:10:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218407#M174483</link>
      <description>the coding for getting a single profile seems to be "huge" - has anyone of You figured out, how to get it much simpler?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I thought about using profiles in windows-script, but there has to be much more profiles - not only one or two. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ok - You can copy-paste the code for each extra profile and then rename all the variable-names for each new - but is there really no way to get this simpler?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:23:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218407#M174483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hmooslechner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-20T04:23:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218408#M174484</link>
      <description>Could you possibly loop it with a running array or buffer, then pull the desired profiles referencing the array or buffer? Max value being how ever many &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;myProfileIdx[ ]&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; you decided to include in your parameter list.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218408#M174484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-20T04:40:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218409#M174485</link>
      <description>Hello everyone! I wrote a simple script by archicad 22 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is the main code
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;I&gt;
&lt;/I&gt;dim pfsj2[]    
pen 1
	
for i = 1 to MULTIPLECO_A
	jdsl=0 		    !Calculate the number of points
	!----------------------------get profile number and geometry
	n = request{2}("Profile_components", myProfileIdx&lt;I&gt;, jmsl, jglx)   !profile number
	n = REQUEST ("Profile_default_geometry", myProfileIdx&lt;I&gt;, pfsj2)    !profile geometry
	if jmsl&amp;gt;0 then 
		for i2 = 1 to jmsl
			!------------------------------------Collection point
	        n = REQUEST{3} ("Profile_component_info", myProfileIdx&lt;I&gt;, i2, "gs_profile_surface", _surface) !MAT
			for i3 = 1 to pfsj2[i2]
				jdsl=jdsl+1 								!Calculate the number of points
				x=pfsj2[jmsl+5*jdsl-5+1]
				y=pfsj2[jmsl+5*jdsl-5+2]
	           if  pfsj2[jmsl+5*jdsl]=900  then sn =  900  
	           if  pfsj2[jmsl+5*jdsl]=4000 then sn =  4015
	           if  pfsj2[jmsl+5*jdsl]=-1   then sn =  -1
	           if  pfsj2[jmsl+5*jdsl]=0    then sn =  15  
				put x,y,sn,_surface
			next i3
			!------------------------------------MODEL
	        SPRISM_{4}  _surface,_surface,_surface,1+2+4+8, 
				        nsp/4,
				        0, 0,    0, 1,1,0,    
				        0, 0,    0, 1,0,0,
				        get(nsp)
		next i2
	endif
next i
&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218409#M174485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T01:47:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218410#M174486</link>
      <description>The issue with using an array in the parameters to define the profile is that the selection can only be done by &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; rather than by drop down and since you cannot view the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index numbers&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; anywhere other than the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Attribute Manager&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;, this is not a viable option. If we were able to use requests in the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Parameter Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; this could have worked as then you could have a second and third dummie parameter with one being a standard profile selection, and the other displaying the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index number&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; of the selected profile, but alas, this is not the case...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you can modify parameter arrays via the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;UI Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; this might be possible, as requests work there. The extra work here may as well be used to duplicate standard profile parameters with additional &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;HIDEPARAMETER&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; statements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 03:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218410#M174486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T03:00:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218411#M174487</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Lingwisyer wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
The issue with using an array in the parameters to define the profile is that the selection can only be done by &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; rather than by drop down and since you cannot view the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index numbers&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; anywhere other than the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Attribute Manager&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;, this is not a viable option. If we were able to use requests in the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Parameter Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; this could have worked as then you could have a second and third dummie parameter with one being a standard profile selection, and the other displaying the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;index number&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; of the selected profile, but alas, this is not the case...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you can modify parameter arrays via the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;UI Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; this might be possible, as requests work there. The extra work here may as well be used to duplicate standard profile parameters with additional &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;HIDEPARAMETER&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; statements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 03:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218411#M174487</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T03:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218412#M174488</link>
      <description>Well, that was easy enough. I have not played around with the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;UI Script&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; much so I was not sure how it would work.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 03:37:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218412#M174488</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T03:37:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDL: Multiple Complex Profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218413#M174489</link>
      <description>So, the block that we usually include in the Master Script is almost entirely regarding structural function? With the &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;rawprofilegeometry&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; being the break down of the profile into it's structural components?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If that is the case, for many uses, the only bit that might be useful is the bounding box request. A 26 line reduction per profile.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/GDL-Multiple-Complex-Profiles/m-p/218413#M174489</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-26T08:42:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

