<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Double Slope Steel Frame settings in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270363#M177207</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;I'm working with the "Double Slope" steel frame.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a way to show it with a horizontal top?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm considering using 2x Lean-to frames with a beam connecting them, but would prefer to have the steel frame as a single object if possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 06:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Johann_P</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-22T06:13:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Double Slope Steel Frame settings</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270363#M177207</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;I'm working with the "Double Slope" steel frame.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a way to show it with a horizontal top?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm considering using 2x Lean-to frames with a beam connecting them, but would prefer to have the steel frame as a single object if possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 06:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270363#M177207</guid>
      <dc:creator>Johann_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T06:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Double Slope Steel Frame settings</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270364#M177208</link>
      <description>If you experience any serious problems with this library part element - you always can replace it with a beam - as  it has a lot of new features there and let to model structural frames using just one element.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270364#M177208</guid>
      <dc:creator>Podolsky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-25T15:45:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Double Slope Steel Frame settings</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270365#M177209</link>
      <description>Yes.  The beam solution is even better if you want to schedule/quantify individual parts of it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 17:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Double-Slope-Steel-Frame-settings/m-p/270365#M177209</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-25T17:49:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

