<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Frustrating inclination inaccuracy in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670650#M177323</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I would think the problem is: for whatever reason Beam Slant Angle displays 2 decimals even if you are using 4-decimal precision working units.&amp;nbsp;Doesn’t the beam inclination get “fixed” if you overwrite (retype) 2.86 into the Beam Slant Angle settting field in the Info Box (which is displaying 2.86 but thinking 2.8624NN…; “fixed” in quotes because sticking with two decimals would require modifying slopes and perhaps positioning of all beams; alternatively, sticking with the base geometry inclination requires forgetting about rounded hundredths, and just never forgetting that beam settings displays a rounded value)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-24T00:38:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Frustrating inclination inaccuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670612#M177321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have designed beams and slabs with a slant inclination of 2.86 degrees&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I looked at a section, I noticed a slight discrepancy between the beam, and a line drawn with the same 2.86 degree inclination&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I placed 2 angle measures and the line correctly displays 2.8600 degrees but the beam shows 2.8624 degrees&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why is this happening???&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/89890i91C1F99BF7AC2F60/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 4.42.42 PM.png" title="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 4.42.42 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/89891iD8EF1321F1B036FA/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 4.31.58 PM.png" title="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 4.31.58 PM.png" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 13:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670612#M177321</guid>
      <dc:creator>Achille Pavlidis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T13:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frustrating inclination inaccuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670648#M177322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is curious. Could it have anything to do with Reference Axis position or the Start/End Angles of the Beam?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you should the settings of the Beam and exactly how you modeled it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried to replicate it, but for me, it worked fine in Ac28.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670648#M177322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T18:35:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frustrating inclination inaccuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670650#M177323</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I would think the problem is: for whatever reason Beam Slant Angle displays 2 decimals even if you are using 4-decimal precision working units.&amp;nbsp;Doesn’t the beam inclination get “fixed” if you overwrite (retype) 2.86 into the Beam Slant Angle settting field in the Info Box (which is displaying 2.86 but thinking 2.8624NN…; “fixed” in quotes because sticking with two decimals would require modifying slopes and perhaps positioning of all beams; alternatively, sticking with the base geometry inclination requires forgetting about rounded hundredths, and just never forgetting that beam settings displays a rounded value)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Frustrating-inclination-inaccuracy/m-p/670650#M177323</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-24T00:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

