<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VMFusion or Parallels in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40351#M20119</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hello all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am seriously thinking on moving from pc to a mac. However, I'm using the Archicad version for Windows and have been going through the web looking for some "virtualization" software so that I can run it inside OSX. It seems to me that the 2 biggies are VMWare Fusion and Parallels. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'd like to know, between the two, which is "stable"/reliable to work with Archicad?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I remembered looking at a comparison chart saying that Fusion did not have OpenGL capability. Is this critical for Archicad performance?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Many thanks for the feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;
Joaquim&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-28T16:16:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VMFusion or Parallels</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40351#M20119</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hello all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am seriously thinking on moving from pc to a mac. However, I'm using the Archicad version for Windows and have been going through the web looking for some "virtualization" software so that I can run it inside OSX. It seems to me that the 2 biggies are VMWare Fusion and Parallels. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'd like to know, between the two, which is "stable"/reliable to work with Archicad?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I remembered looking at a comparison chart saying that Fusion did not have OpenGL capability. Is this critical for Archicad performance?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Many thanks for the feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;
Joaquim&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40351#M20119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-28T16:16:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMFusion or Parallels</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40352#M20120</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;jagostinho wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I am seriously thinking on moving from pc to a mac. However, I'm using the Archicad version for Windows and have been going through the web looking for some "virtualization" software so that I can run it inside OSX. It seems to me that the 2 biggies are VMWare Fusion and Parallels. &lt;BR /&gt;
I'd like to know, between the two, which is "stable"/reliable to work with Archicad?&lt;BR /&gt;
I remembered looking at a comparison chart saying that Fusion did not have OpenGL capability. Is this critical for Archicad performance?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
You can simply switch to the mac version of ArchiCAD. Far simpler, you don't need any virtualization software, and it will run faster.&lt;BR /&gt;
Otherwise, I have used ArchiCAD with Parallels and it runs without problems. I haven't used VMWare Fusion.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:08:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40352#M20120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Wessel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-28T18:08:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMFusion or Parallels</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40353#M20121</link>
      <description>Your AC DVD includes the Mac OS version for free so there is no need for Parallels or Fusion. As to choosing between them, though I have both at this time I prefer Fusion.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40353#M20121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-28T20:02:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMFusion or Parallels</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40354#M20122</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt; I prefer Fusion.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

cmon Eduardo !! you know the next question, dont u?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:15:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/VMFusion-or-Parallels/m-p/40354#M20122</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rakela Raul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-28T20:15:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

