<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MODELLING PROBLEM in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49854#M25344</link>
    <description>Is there a reason why you cannot use a mesh, with the bottom sliced off by a convenient roof?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-12-12T17:06:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49853#M25343</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I will appreciate if anyone can help with some advise on a problem I'm having with modelling a roof structure. &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
I attach a sketch of the item in section/elevation.  &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
It consists of a RC slab, angled at 20 deg, tapering to the outside edge.   &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
The slab has some cutout openings in places for architectural reasons.  &lt;BR /&gt;
I would have created a library part by using a slab in plan, rotate, view in isometric from top, save as library part etc., except I cannot then do the cutouts, a significant item that I want to be able to view on the model.  &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
Another way I thought to do it would be to construct the item using a roof plane with the maximum thickness of the element and angled to the underside (20deg), duplicate another and adjust to the angle of the top plane (15deg), adjust vertically to an appropriate dimension and do a solid element operation to achieve the tapering effect. All this works fine, except that when doing the cutouts, the SEO function does not work any more. So I ended up with 2 roofplanes at different angles, with required cutouts in plan, but then I have to create a "filler piece" from a slab as end covers and as these are cut away as 45 deg in plan, it's a time-consuming process of trial and error.  &lt;BR /&gt;
It also seems very laborious, and I'm sure there must be a simpler workaround to achieving this aim.  &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 13:23:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49853#M25343</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fritz T</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-23T13:23:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49854#M25344</link>
      <description>Is there a reason why you cannot use a mesh, with the bottom sliced off by a convenient roof?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49854#M25344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T17:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49855#M25345</link>
      <description>Get AC10 and use complex profiles  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Djordje's way sounds good otherwise.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49855#M25345</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T20:10:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49856#M25346</link>
      <description>Thanks Djordje, works fine! javascript:emoticon(':idea:')&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I know I should upgrade to AC10.. one of these days..</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49856#M25346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fritz T</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T20:39:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49857#M25347</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;s2art wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Get AC10 and use complex profiles  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Djordje's way sounds good otherwise.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Holes are the reason why I suggested meshes ...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49857#M25347</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T17:26:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49858#M25348</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Djordje wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Holes are the reason why I suggested meshes ... &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Complex profiles with SEO's for holes???</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49858#M25348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T19:36:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49859#M25349</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;s2art wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Djordje wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Holes are the reason why I suggested meshes ... &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Complex profiles with SEO's for holes???&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

...equals wrong 2D ...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:23:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49859#M25349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-15T04:23:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MODELLING PROBLEM</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49860#M25350</link>
      <description>In some areas where the edges of the holes are sloped, I used SEO. &lt;BR /&gt;
You are right, 2d is a mess. Solved that by using a 2d element on plan view, &amp;amp; detail section drawing with correct dim's. &lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for input</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/MODELLING-PROBLEM/m-p/49860#M25350</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fritz T</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-15T06:17:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

