<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wall Cleanup in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66788#M34056</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Stress wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;As I am finding. It solves one problem... and creates another.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
i don't think there is anything out there yet that allows us to produce truly intelligent building systems (assemblies). i think what cadimage have done within the boundaries of - and compared to - GS's own accessories API is the best out there.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
sure, it creates its own set of problems when complex or atypical building systems are employed, but it allows you to work at a conceptual level &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;within the virtual building concept&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;. the 'accessory' element feels BIM. complex profiles were a dead tech before they even began.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
just my opinion, but GS jumped left when they should've jumped right and developed the 'accessories' concept into something akin to complex assemblies. i'm not talking about giving us tools that can replicate every building system and it's particulars, but giving us a framework from which we can create our own sets of building systems simply and efficiently . . . this was the promise of GDL redsquare 5 or so years ago. i think it just got too difficult . . .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
~/archiben</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 05:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>__archiben</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-08T05:06:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66753#M34021</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I know this must have been covered before but I don't know how to search the archives.  How do I get walls of different thicknesses to clean up automatically?  Or what is the best way to do it manually?  See picture:&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/74214i77484A69A813F18D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Picture 6.png" title="Picture 6.png" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66753#M34021</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-04T18:39:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66754#M34022</link>
      <description>The easiest way is to make sure the reference line of both walls lines up (along the side of the wall that should align)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:15:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66754#M34022</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-04T19:15:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66755#M34023</link>
      <description>Specifically, I would intersect them as below, with the coplanar walls joined at point A and the perpendicular one forming a butt joint at point B. It may also work just fine if all three intersect at A, but there is a chance that the two thinner walls will form a miter leaving a line in elevation in the corridor. In my solution there may be a line in the inside elevation of the shaft wall, but I expect that is probably not a problem. Either solution should clean up in plan.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66755#M34023</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-04T22:01:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66756#M34024</link>
      <description>ok , talking about this , i have always have problems with this issue, usually i try many things " no obvious rules" if it didn't work i'll add the intersection shape as a "polygonal wall", but still i think i am doing something wrong</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:01:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66756#M34024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-06T12:01:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66757#M34025</link>
      <description>Here are three variations of your condition plus an asymmetrical offset. In all cases the diagonal wall must be offset to align with the intersection of the orthogonal ones. (Use offset instead of centerline - Modify Wall doesn't work if any centerline walls are selected.)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:28:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66757#M34025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-06T13:28:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66758#M34026</link>
      <description>oooh!!! so this is the use of View reference lines option!!  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
THANX..but still i feel like  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; .. really  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; thanx!!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66758#M34026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-06T14:42:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Wall node problem</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66759#M34027</link>
      <description>Hi folks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is an annoying problem: When I create 3 walls (same material and hotspot) linked by a node, the 2d view is perfect, but the 3d view creates lines in the nodes!  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_evil.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  Is there any standard procedure for this situation?...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66759#M34027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-06T18:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66760#M34028</link>
      <description>Hi folks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Sorry I didn't saw this thread and posted a new thread with the same situation...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is an annoying problem: When I create 3 walls with a "T" shape (same material and hotspot) linked by a node, the 2d view is perfect, but the 3d view creates lines in the nodes!  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_evil.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  Is there any standard procedure for this situation?...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66760#M34028</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T10:00:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 Wall node problem</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66761#M34029</link>
      <description>Sorry.... there was a thread with this subject &lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=92118#92118" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_redface.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66761#M34029</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T10:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66762#M34030</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
are you sure that yours walls are put in a line ?&lt;BR /&gt;
one of them in your picture (at the right bottom) seems to be&lt;BR /&gt;
out of the line ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66762#M34030</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T10:13:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66763#M34031</link>
      <description>They are exactly aligned...  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66763#M34031</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T10:29:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66764#M34032</link>
      <description>therefore except if in "3D windows setting", the "contours" is not off&lt;BR /&gt;
I do not understand the problem. &lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;
Jean-Luc</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66764#M34032</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T10:39:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66765#M34033</link>
      <description>You have a couple of tricky ones here. Both are because two walls are forming a miter joint thus expressing the corner in what should be a smooth face. They are made more difficult by the differential heights and thicknesses.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A: Due to the different thicknesses of the outer walls, the only solution I can think of is to make a poly wall at the corner as a kind of 3D patch. If you model it as shown all the walls should clean up to it nicely. It will need to be trimmed (SEO or Trim to Roof) where it extends into the lower wall.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
B: If the outside walls are really the same fill and thickness you can just extend the higher one to replace the lower and trim it with an SEO. Since the lower wall seems to enclose an open court (ie. no roof available) you would need to place the operator on a hidden layer, unless you need to model some coping there anyway.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/68045i4DA3BE743C4D9416/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="wall_problem_251.jpg" title="wall_problem_251.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:00:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66765#M34033</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T14:00:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66766#M34034</link>
      <description>yes I did a test and depending on the texture I see this line linking both&lt;BR /&gt;
walls. However likely it does not affect the rendering. Moreover, if we&lt;BR /&gt;
have to use SEO for such things...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66766#M34034</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T14:30:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66767#M34035</link>
      <description>Thanks Jean-Luc and Matthew,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Nice work-around and explanation Matthew!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But its really sad to know that an everyday situation like this has to be solved by a tricky work-around...  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_cry.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  Does anybody in GS knows about this matter?... Can we call this a bug?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66767#M34035</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T14:51:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66768#M34036</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Braza wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Can we call this a bug?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

From what I can tell from your posted image, you'd need control joints in those two locations anyway, so actually the model is accurate!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66768#M34036</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T15:01:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66769#M34037</link>
      <description>I got-like many people- lot of difficulties with wall intersections...normal&lt;BR /&gt;
but may I ask you why it's disturbing you to see this line in 3D view?&lt;BR /&gt;
you meet with some others issues then ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:03:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66769#M34037</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T15:03:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66770#M34038</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Braza wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Can we call this a bug?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Yes we can.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Laura wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;From what I can tell from your posted image, you'd need control joints in those two locations anyway, so actually the model is accurate!&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Say what? In typical construction there is no reason to believe that the cladding will join where your wall do within ArchiCAD. A control joint is a thing. It has a dimension. If you want one, add one, exactly where you want it, but don't force me to have one. This is a line, a graphic problem, a bug.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:54:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66770#M34038</guid>
      <dc:creator>SeaGeoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T20:54:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66771#M34039</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Geoff wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;In typical construction there is no reason to believe that the cladding will join where your wall do within ArchiCAD.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

No, but it is good practice to locate control joints at changes in wall height, although I've seen a lot of (typically residential) construction that disregards this practice.  Also will depend on what type of cladding is being used...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66771#M34039</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T21:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Cleanup</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66772#M34040</link>
      <description>In the earlier example the walls change height. But the display bug happens whether they do or not. Control joints are not an excuse and having to use an SEO to work around a bug in a very typical wall condition that occurs on every job is just not right.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Wall-Cleanup/m-p/66772#M34040</guid>
      <dc:creator>SeaGeoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-07T21:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

