<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ? in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70277#M35903</link>
    <description>Much more stable-crashes are rare.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Steve</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Dolbee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-26T11:09:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70276#M35902</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Just ordered Archicad 9 (upgrade from 8.1) &lt;BR /&gt;
Would like to here what those of you who are already using AC9 think about it, if you have the time.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 03:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70276#M35902</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-26T03:07:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70277#M35903</link>
      <description>Much more stable-crashes are rare.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70277#M35903</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Dolbee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-26T11:09:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70278#M35904</link>
      <description>stable&lt;BR /&gt;
better interface&lt;BR /&gt;
LightWorks rendering</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70278#M35904</guid>
      <dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T09:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70279#M35905</link>
      <description>Worth it just for Lightworks&lt;BR /&gt;
Never really had a major problem with stability, but 9 seems good.&lt;BR /&gt;
Selection tool modifications good, most of the time.&lt;BR /&gt;
PM seems slower, esp in "opening ArchiCAD in background" but enhancements worth the wait.&lt;BR /&gt;
Text 90% better, could still do with a little tweaking though.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70279#M35905</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T20:19:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70280#M35906</link>
      <description>I have had plenty of problems with AC9 on a PC. Always found previous versions to be very stable but am plagued with plenty of crashes and problems. Recently I can't even open files that I just worked on yesterday. Very disappointed.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70280#M35906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-29T15:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 9 - How does it compare to earlier updates ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70281#M35907</link>
      <description>In view of the fact that most users of ArchiCAD are PC users, and that you are more-or-less alone in this problem, have you considered that it might be your machine?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A strategy for dealing with uncooperating files is to merge them into new projects - just as a test. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is likely a hard drive issue.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What is your hardware setup?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BTW - on this forum it is common for members to list their hardware and software configurations to narrow the possibilities.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-9-How-does-it-compare-to-earlier-updates/m-p/70281#M35907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-29T20:54:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

