<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: is ac9 ready for tiger? in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72057#M36862</link>
    <description>thanks for the info gergely! the issues you have found so far are not deal breakers.&lt;BR /&gt;
is it faster and better?&lt;BR /&gt;
timo</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aahatimo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-28T20:36:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72050#M36855</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;has the current 2018 build of ac 9 been tested for compatability with apple's upcoming release of os 10.4 tiger?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72050#M36855</guid>
      <dc:creator>aahatimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-27T22:00:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72051#M36856</link>
      <description>Related to the release of Tiger, I have heard that tiger has improved open GL capabilities.  I wonder how this will effect using Archicad?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72051#M36856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-27T22:27:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72052#M36857</link>
      <description>good question - may be you can try it out for us &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
My gut feeling is it will work but will be some gremlins</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72052#M36857</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-27T23:00:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72053#M36858</link>
      <description>Good Question.  Apple just sent word that my copy of Tiger will be here in two days.  Could someone from GS please address this question?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72053#M36858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chazz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T13:01:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72054#M36859</link>
      <description>It does seem like someone from Graphisoft should make the plunge first and let us know how it goes...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72054#M36859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T14:43:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72055#M36860</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Mike wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;It does seem like someone from Graphisoft should make the plunge first and let us know how it goes...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
hopefully gs has had the beta version for some time. are there any ac user's that were involved with tiger beta? non disclosure should be up, friday....</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72055#M36860</guid>
      <dc:creator>aahatimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T15:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72056#M36861</link>
      <description>We have tested ArchiCAD 8.1 and ArchiCAD 9 on Tiger, and have not found any major problems. These issues were found so far: &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- It is not possible to change the Redline color and font in Project Reviewer running under Safari or Internet Explorer. It is also impossible to send e-mails from the Project Reviewer Environment. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- The ArchiCAD desktop icon is different on 10.4 and 10.3.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72056#M36861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Kmethy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T16:50:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: is ac9 ready for tiger?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72057#M36862</link>
      <description>thanks for the info gergely! the issues you have found so far are not deal breakers.&lt;BR /&gt;
is it faster and better?&lt;BR /&gt;
timo</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/is-ac9-ready-for-tiger/m-p/72057#M36862</guid>
      <dc:creator>aahatimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T20:36:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

