<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SEO properties lost in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9280#M3932</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Sergio wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Seems like I'm having a problem that I shouldn't be. I've done a number of SEO operations trying to subtract a slab from a thickened ground plane and it worked wonderfully... for a while. However, after going to the section view, every once in a while I notice that it looses the info.&lt;BR /&gt;
.....&lt;BR /&gt;
Anybody see this before and know of a solution or workaround?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
I have had the same problem a few times.  It seems to me that if I have footings/slab edge thickenings  cutting a site mesh using subtraction with upward extrusion, the basement floor slab edges coincide with this other cut and the slab does not register as a valid operator element since the slab edges are on the line already cut.  If the footings/slab edge thickenings cut the mesh using subtraction only, the Slab cut seems to take.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not sure if this is what causes the erratic behaviour, but it made some kind of sense to me at the time. &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Lindahl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-03-20T07:39:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SEO properties lost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9277#M3929</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Seems like I'm having a problem that I shouldn't be. I've done a number of SEO operations trying to subtract a slab from a thickened ground plane and it worked wonderfully... for a while. However, after going to the section view, every once in a while I notice that it looses the info.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm having a similar problem where one of the foundation walls is not subtracting from the plane, and I end up having 2 fill patterns one on top of the other.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anybody see this before and know of a solution or workaround?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 14:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9277#M3929</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T14:38:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEO properties lost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9278#M3930</link>
      <description>I have been working extensively with SEO and have not had any problems. However sometimes it appears that an object has been selected but I realize later that I had selected an overlaying object. Another possible cause of your problems could be that the operator or target have been moved or accidentally deleted.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9278#M3930</guid>
      <dc:creator>lapishawaii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-11T09:59:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEO properties lost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9279#M3931</link>
      <description>I've not looked at the list for a while.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What is 'SEO"?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9279#M3931</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeesW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-20T07:06:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEO properties lost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9280#M3932</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Sergio wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Seems like I'm having a problem that I shouldn't be. I've done a number of SEO operations trying to subtract a slab from a thickened ground plane and it worked wonderfully... for a while. However, after going to the section view, every once in a while I notice that it looses the info.&lt;BR /&gt;
.....&lt;BR /&gt;
Anybody see this before and know of a solution or workaround?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
I have had the same problem a few times.  It seems to me that if I have footings/slab edge thickenings  cutting a site mesh using subtraction with upward extrusion, the basement floor slab edges coincide with this other cut and the slab does not register as a valid operator element since the slab edges are on the line already cut.  If the footings/slab edge thickenings cut the mesh using subtraction only, the Slab cut seems to take.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not sure if this is what causes the erratic behaviour, but it made some kind of sense to me at the time. &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9280#M3932</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Lindahl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-20T07:39:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEO properties lost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9281#M3933</link>
      <description>I have had the same type of problem where one the SEO would work fine and then other days it would revert back. I had roofs to form a ramp and my main basement slab, the weird thing was some of the ramp roofs would work and others would not.&lt;BR /&gt;
 I ended up cutting a hole in the site mesh, but isn't really the look on my sections I wanted.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
on another note:&lt;BR /&gt;
 my project has .pln modules of indiviual apartments inserted into an overall structure model.&lt;BR /&gt;
  I found that trim to roof did not trim the module walls, but doing a SEO using my roofs worked great ( so far ).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:21:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/SEO-properties-lost/m-p/9281#M3933</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-24T00:21:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

